When that, that does not stop to be written stops of not being written

Abstract

At this conference, the author gives his testimony of how he introduced himself to one of its important contributions to contemporary psychoanalysis, the concept of significant “siderante” and how was his interlecution with Jacques Lacan about the original dimension of the symbolic and its consequence to think how the subject would react to the trauma he are subjected in their encounter with what “does not cease to write,” the real. From the unfolding of his testimony, the author argues that this traumatic experience is structural. That is, this experience shows us that “what never ceases to not write” beyond any culture, is of the order of universal experience. He questions, however, what would be required to leave the subject of trauma, such a fundamental question to the outcome of any psychoanalytic treatment. He concludes that for this it is necessary the occurrence of de-sideration, which consists in finding the significant S1 whereby “That does not cease to write.”