Validation of a technology for self-care of family caregivers of cancer patients in home-based palliative care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192040957Keywords:
Oncology Nursing; Caregivers; Validation Studies; Educational Technology; Health Education.Abstract
Objective: to validate the content of a booklet to subsidize the self-care of family caregivers of cancer patients in home-based palliative care. Methods: this is a methodological study. The participants were 11 expert judges. This study was aided by a questionnaire organized according to a Likert scale with items distributed in objectives, structure, presentation and relevance. The quantitative verification of the results was based on a descriptive statistical analysis. Results: validation was based on the analysis of the judges, reaching a higher parameter than the one proposed (0.78) for the content validity index; the 21 items surpassed the value of 80.0%. Conclusion: it is considered that the booklet is validated and can promote self-care of caregivers of cancer patients in the home setting.
References
World Health Organization (WHO). Palliative care [Internet]. 2017 [cited Apr 12, 2019]. Available from:http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care
Sun V, Grant M, Koczywas M, Freeman B, Zachariah F, Fujinami R, et al. Effectiveness of an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention for family caregivers in lung cancer. Cancer. 2015; 121(20):3737-45. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29567
Barton MK. Structured palliative care program found to be helpful for caregivers of patients with lung câncer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66(1):5-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21297
Pires AF, Santos BN, Santos PN, Brasil VR, Luna AA. A importância da teoria do autocuidado de Dorothea E. Orem no cuidado de enfermagem. Rev Rede Cuid Saúde [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2019 abr 13];9(2):1-4. Disponível em: http://publicacoes.unigranrio.edu.br/index.php/rcs/article/view/2533/1292
Heynsbergh N, Heckel L, Botti M, Livingston PM. Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9
Grossi LM, Pisa IT, Marin HF. Tecnologia da Informação e comunicação na auditoria em enfermagem. J Health Inform [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2019 abr 08];7(1):30-4. Disponível em: http://www.jhi-sbis.saude.ws/ojs-jhi/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/viewFile/314/227
Alburquerque AFLL, Pinheiro AKB, Linhares FMP, Guedes TG. Technology for self-care for ostomized women’s sexual and reproductive health. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016; 69(6):1164-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0302
Medeiros RKS, Ferreira JMA, Pinto DPSR, Vitor AF, Santos VEP, Barichello E. Modelo de validação de conteúdo de Pasquali nas pesquisas em Enfermagem. Rev Enf Ref. 2015; serIV(4):127-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12707/RIV14009
Orem DE. Nursing: concepts of practice. St Lows: Mosby; 2001.
Fehring R. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung [Internet]. 1987 [cited Apr 13, 2019]; 16(6):625-9. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/11f7/d8b02e02681433695c9e1724bd66c4d98636.pdf
Benevides JL, Coutinho JFV, Pascoal LC, Joventino ES, Martins MC, Gubert FA, et al. Development and validation of educational technology for venous ulcer care. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016; 50(2):309-16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000200018
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Krau SD. Technology in nursing: the mandate for new implementation and adoption approaches. Nurs Clin North Am. 2015; 50(2):11-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2015.03.011
Shin JY, Kang TI, Noll RB, Choi SW. Supporting caregivers of patients with cancer: a summary of technology-mediated interventions and future directions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018; (38):838-49. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_201397
Filgueiras TF, Silva RA, Pimenta CJL, Filgueiras TF, Oliveira SHS, Castro RCMB. Instrument for nursing consultation to pregnant women with diabetes mellitus. Rev Rene. 2019; 20:e40104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192040104
Santiago JCS, Moreira TMM. Booklet content validation on excess weight for adults with hypertension. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019; 72(1):95-101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0105
Qiu C, Chen S, Yao Y, Zhao Y, Xin Y, Zang X. Adaption and validation of Nijmegen continuity questionnaire to recognize the influencing factors of continuity of care for hypertensive patients in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3915-6
Martins MC, Ferreira AMV, Nascimento LA, Aires JS, Almeida PC, Ximenes LB. Influence of an educational strategy to promote the use of regional food. Rev Rene. 2015; 16(2):242-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2015000200014
Lapid MI, Atherton PJ, Clark MM, Kung S, Sloan JA, Rummans TA. Cancer caregiver: perceived benefits of technology. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21(11):893-902. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0117
Varela AIS, Rosa LM, Radünz V, Salum NC, Souza NCJ. Educational booklet for patients in palliative care and their families: Construction strategies. Rev Enferm UFPE on line [Internet]. 2017 [cited Jun 10, 2019]:11(Supl.7):2955-62. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/viewFile/11110/19210
