Construction and validation of an instrument for Forensic Nursing and similar graduation disciplines

Jhuliano Silva Ramos de Souza; Zélia Marilda Rodrigues Resck; Cláudia Umbelina Baptista Andrade; Christianne Alves Pereira Calheiros; Fábio de Souza Terra; Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa; Sueli de Carvalho Vilela

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20202144196

Authors

Jhuliano Silva Ramos de Souza Universidade Federal de Alfenas http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4338-4433
Zélia Marilda Rodrigues Resck Universidade Federal de Alfenas http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-8381
Cláudia Umbelina Baptista Andrade Universidade José do Rosário Vellano http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-2274
Christianne Alves Pereira Calheiros Universidade Federal de Alfenas http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-6034
Fábio de Souza Terra Universidade Federal de Alfenas http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-3039
Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa Universidade Federal de Alfenas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-9638
Sueli de Carvalho Vilela Universidade Federal de Alfenas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3034-3904

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202144196

Keywords:

Nursing; Forensic Nursing; Education, Higher; Validation Study; Data Collection.

Abstract

Objective: to construct and validate a questionnaire for tracking disciplines and content of Forensic Nursing and similar disciplines in undergraduate courses. Methods: methodological study for the construction and validation of content and semantics. The items were constructed and categorized using content analysis, based on the national and international theoretical framework of Forensic Nursing, structured in three sections with dichotomous and subjective questions. Content and semantics were validated using the brainstorming technique and an 80% concordance index among the judges. Results: the sections were: identification of courses, of disciplines of Forensic Nursing and Violence, and contents of Forensic Nursing discipline. Conclusion: the Forensic Nursing Discipline and Content Supervision Questionnaire for Graduation Nursing Courses was considered easy to use and dynamic to assess the situation of Forensic Nursing and Violence-related subjects in Nursing courses at college Institutions.

References

Ghofrani Kelishami F, Manoochehri H, Mohtashami J, Kiani M. Consequences of presence of forensic nurses in health care system: a qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020; 25(3):195-201. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_119_19

Cunha M, Libório R, Coelho M. Knowledge questionnaire over forensics nursing practices. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016; 217:1089-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.118

Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Resolução nº 389, de outubro de 2011. Procedimentos de título de pós-graduação lato e stricto sensu concedido a enfermeiros e lista as especialidades [Internet]. 2011 [cited July 20, 2020]. Available from: http://www.cofen.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/resolucao_389_2011.pdf

Teixeira E. Em tempos de novas Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DCN) para o curso de graduação em enfermagem. Rev Enferm UFSM. 2017; 7(2):iii-iv. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769228859

Felipe HR, Cunha M, Ribeiro VDS, Zamarioli CM, Santos CBD, Duarte JC, et al. Knowledge Questionnaire over Forensics Nursing Practices: adaptation to Brazil and psychometric properties. Rev Enf Ref. 2019; Série IV(23):99-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV19045

Coluci MZO, Alexandre NMC, Milani D. Construction of measurement instruments in the area of health. Cienc Saúde Coletiva. 2015; 20(3):925-36. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013

Polit DF. Assessing measurement in health: beyond reliability and validity. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52(11):1746-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.002

Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Gonçalves N, Romanoski PJ. Sychometric properties of measurement instruments: conceptual bases and evaluation methods - part I. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2017; 26(4):e1600017. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017001600017

Cunha CM, Almeida Neto OP, Stackfleth R. Principais métodos de avaliação psicométrica da confiabilidade de instrumentos de medida. Rev Atenç Saúde. 2016; 14(49):98-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.13037/ras.vol14n49.3671

Medeiros RKS, Ferreira Júnior MA, Pinto DPSR, Vitor AF, Santos VEP, Barichello E. Pasquali’s model of content validation in Nursing research. Rev Enf Ref. 2015; Série IV(4):127-35. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.12707/RIV14009

Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2013.

Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17(4):758-64. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018

Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2016.

Fagundes AJFM. Descrição, definição e registro de comportamento. São Paulo: Edicon; 2015.

Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015; 18(3):66-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129

Nogueira VDO, Cunha ICKO. Coordenação de cursos de graduação em enfermagem à luz das tendências de métodos de cenários. Enferm Foco. 2018; 9(4):23-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2018.v9.n4.1171

Faleiros F, Käppler C, Pontes FAR, Silva SSC, Goes FSN, Cucick CD. Use of virtual questionnaire and dissemination as a data collection strategy in scientific studies. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2016; 25(4):e3880014. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072016003880014

Silva WA, Santos SCA, Cruz RP, Santos ALS. Google forms como ferramenta para avaliação da aprendizagem. Rev Tecnol Educ [Internet]. 2018 [cited Feb 2, 2020]; 27:1-12. Available from: https://tecedu.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Art5.Vol27-Ed.Tem%C3%A1ticaIX-Nov-2018.pdf

Ferreira RC, Montanari FL, Ribeiro E, Correia MDL, Manzoli JPB, Duran ECM. Development and validation of a nursing care instrument for patients in intensive care units. Cogitare Enferm. 2018; 23:e57539. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v23i4.57539