Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Analysis of the contribution of universities in the creation of technology-based firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.68011Keywords:
entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial ecosystem, technology-based firms, universities, multiple casesAbstract
This paper aimed to analyze how higher education institutions contribute to the creation of technology-based firms. The research method was that of multiple cases, represented by two universities and five technology-based firms in Belo Horizonte. We selected businesses that had as founders students or former students of the researched universities. The results showed that the institutions have robust structures and programs, but still act in a little internally integrated way. In addition, the entrepreneurs do not identify the contribution of their university education in their entrepreneurial trajectory. The study contributes to the understanding of the role of the university in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. From a theoretical point of view, the study identified categories of analysis to evaluate entrepreneurial universities.
References
Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
Arruda, C., Cozzi, A., Nogueira, V., & Costa, V. (2013). O ecossistema empreendedor brasileiro de startups: uma análise dos determinantes do empreendedorismo no Brasil a partir dos pilares da OCDE. In Núcleo de Inovação e Empreendedorismo (pp. 1-51). FDC – Fundação Dom Cabral. https://www.fdc.org.br/conhecimento/publicacoes/relatorio-de-pesquisa-28442
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
Bardin, L. (2011). Organização da análise. In L. Bardin. Análise de conteúdo (pp. 125-170). Edições 70.
Borissenko, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda. CIRCLE Working Paper, 1-25. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2017_003.html
Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7
Cao, Z., & Shi, X. (2020). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 57, 75-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y
Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8
Clark, B. R. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: new foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 9-25. http://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/37446098.pdf
Clark, B. R. (2006). Pursuing the entrepreneurial university. In J. Audy & M. Morosini (Orgs.), Innovation and entrepreneurialism in the university (pp. 15-27). EDIPCURS. http://nit.uesc.br/portal/assets/files/livros/Inovacao_e_Empreendedorismo_na_Universidade.pdf
Dahlstrand, A. L. (2007). Technology-based entrepreneurship and regional development: the case of Sweden. European Business Review, 19(5), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340710818969
Einsenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry & Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0303
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). Hélice tríplice: Inovação e empreendedorismo universidade – indústria – governo. Estudos Avançados, 31(90), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190003
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. T. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
Foster, G., & Shimizu, C. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics. In Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013 (pp. 1-36). http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdf
Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space – an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6
Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9). 1408-1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281
Ganotakis, P. (2012). Founders’ human capital and the performance of UK new technology based firms. Small Business Economics, 39, 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9309-0
Gaskel, G. (2003). Entrevistas individuais e grupais. In G. Gaskell & M. Bauer (Orgs.), Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: Um manual prático (pp. 64-89). Vozes.
Global Entrepreneurship Index. (2017). The Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017. https://thegedi.org/2017-global-entrepreneurship-index/
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2019). 2019/2020 Global Report. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2019-2020-global-report
Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994) Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800403
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in na emerging economy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 119, 294-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015
Inácio, E., Jr., Autio, E., Morini, C., Gimenez, F., A., P., & Dionisio, E., A. (2016). Analysis of the brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem. Desenvolvimento em Questão, 14(37), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2016.37.5-36
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. The Babsom Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: An evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29, 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2015). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118-2133. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098015586547
Marshall, A. (1985). Princípios de Economia. Nova Cultural.
Maskell, P., & Kebir, L. (2009). What qualifies as a cluster theory? DRUID Working Paper, 1-21. https://ideas.repec.org/p/aal/abbswp/05-09.html
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. In LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (pp. 1-30). http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf
Mineiro, A. A. C., Souza, D, L., Vieira, K. C., Castro, C. C., & Brito, M. J. (2018). Da hélice tríplice a quíntupla: uma revisão sistemática. E&G - Economia & Gestão, 18(51), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2018v18n51p77-93
National Association of Innovative Enterprise Promoting Entities - ANPROTEC. (2019). Mapeamento dos Mecanismos de Geração de Empreendimentos Inovadores no Brasil. https://anprotec.org.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Mapeamento_Empreendimentos_Inovadores.pdf
Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2019). Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 462-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9694-0
Phillpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003
Plonski, G. A. (1999). Cooperação universidade-empresa: um desafio gerencial complexo. Revista de Administração da USP - RAUSP, 34(4), 5-12. http://200.232.30.99/download.asp?file=3404005.pdf
Ragin, C. (1992). Introduction: Cases of “what is a case?”. In C. Ragin & H. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? (pp. 1-17). Cambridge University Press.
Ribeiro, A. T. V. B., Uechi, J. N., & Plonski, G. A. (2018). Building builders: entrepreneurship education from an ecosystem perspective at MIT. Triple Helix, 5(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-018-0051-y
Ruiz, S. M. A., & Martens, C. D. P. (2019). Universidade empreendedora: proposição de modelo teórico. Desenvolvimento em Questão, 17(48), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2019.48.121-138
Schubert, T., & Kroll, H. (2016). Universities’ effects on regional GDP and unemployment: the case of Germany. Papers in Regional Science, 95(3), 467-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12150
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas. (2016). Empreendedorismo nas universidades brasileiras. https://m.sebrae.com.br/Sebrae/Portal%20Sebrae/Anexos/Relatorio%20Endeavor%20impressao.pdf
Spigel, B. (2015). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Suddaby, R., Bruton, G. D., & Si, X. S. (2015). Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.003
Thomas, E., & Pugh, E. (2020). From ‘entrepreneurial’ to ‘engaged’ universities: Social innovation for regional development in the Global South. Regional Studies, 54(12), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1749586
Tornatzky, L. G., & Rideout, E. C. (2014). Innovation U 2.0: reinventing university roles in a knowledge economy. http://www.innovation-u.com/InnovU-2.0_rev-12-14-14.pdf
Torres, S., Alves, S., & Vidal, F. (2017). Parques tecnológicos como empreendimentos imobiliários na América Latina. Contextus - Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 15(1), 84-121. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.v15i1.883
Volles, B. K., Gomes, G., & Parisotto, I. R. S. (2017). Universidade empreendedora e transferência de conhecimento e tecnologia. REAd, 86(1), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.03716.61355
Yin, R. K. (2010). Projetando estudos de caso. In R. K. Yin (Ed.), Estudo de caso: Planejamento e método (pp. 39-79). Bookman.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.
