Commons, property law and management: A bibliometric study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.71820

Keywords:

bibliometric review, common goods, property law, management, evolution

Abstract

In this bibliometric review, with data from the Web Of Science (WOS), the main characteristics of scientific articles published in international journals on Common Goods, Property Law and Management are specified. The result returned 146 works and it was analyzed in 12 categories: temporal evolution of scientific production; temporal evolution of the number of article citations; production by countries; production by networked countries; categories of publications; association between authors and categories, most cited works; citation network; clusters by title; top citations in the category Government and Law, publications in Brazil. There is a growing interest of the scientific community in the matter and from this study other may arise.

Author Biographies

Nélida Reis Caseca Machado, Federal University of Lavras

Professor and Researcher at the Formiga  University Center.

PhD student in Business at the Federal University of Lavras.

José Roberto Pereira, Federal University of Lavras

Tenure Professor in Public Administration and Social Management at the Federal University of Lavras.

Post-Doctor in Social Sciences at the Center for Social Studies of the University of Coimbra.

References

Andrade, D. C. M. (2018). Historicidade da propriedade privada capitalista e os cercamentos. Revista História: Debates e Tendências, 18(3), 408-419. https://doi.org/10.5335/hdtv.18n.3.8597

Araral, E. (2009). What explains collective action in the commons? Theory and evidence from the Philippines. World Development, 37(3), 687-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.002

Araújo, C. A. (2006). Bibliometria : Evolução histórica. Em Questao, 12(1), 11-32. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4656/465645954002.pdf

Assis, L. G. B. (2008). A evolução do direito de propriedade ao longo dos textos constitucionais. Revista da Faculdade de Direito, 103(0), 781. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8235.v103i0p781-791

Basha, S. S., Shahzad, N., & Jeyaraj, R. (2011). Common best proximity points: Global optimization of multi-objective functions. Applied Mathematics Letters, 24(6), 883-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.12.043

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2004). A construção social da realidade - Tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. Vozes.

Borges, G. S., & Carlessi, M. M. (2018). O comum: Considerações entre o enclausuramento do comum e o direito. In A. C. Wolkmer & R. S. Vieira (Orgs.). Anais do Seminário Internacional em Direitos Humanos e Sociedade. http://periodicos.unesc.net/AnaisDirH/article/view/4626

Carcello, J. V. (2009). Governance and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(suppl. 1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9904-z

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317

Correia, M. O. G. (2015). Por uma crítica imanente sobre os limites das políticas públicas de direitos sociais e o Estado na produção do bem comum no modo de produção capitalista. Saude e Sociedade, 24(suppl. 1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902015S01005

Cruz, E. S. T., Pereira, J. R., Cruz, A. O., & Garcia, A. S. (2018). Gestão da água como common pool resource: Revisão integrativa a partir de Elinor Ostrom. Anais do SEMEAD - Seminários em Administração, São Paulo, Brasil, 21. https://login.semead.com.br/21semead/anais/arquivos/218.pdf

Cruz, M. M. (2017). O novo vocabulário do comum: Ensaio para uma leitura pós-colonial. Anais do XVII ENANPUR - Sessão temática X, São Paulo, Brasil, 17. http://anpur.org.br/xviienanpur/principal/publicacoes/XVII.ENANPUR_Anais/ST_Sessoes_Tematicas/ST%209/ST%209.1/ST%209.1-03.pdf

Dahl, A., & Soss, J. (2014). Neoliberalism for the common good? Public value governance and the downsizing of democracy. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 496-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12191

Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2015). Propriedade, apropriação social e instituição do comum. Tempo Social, 27(1), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-207020150114

Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2017). Comum: Ensaio sobre a revolução no século XXI. Boitempo.

Davis, J. (2004). Baking for the common good: a reassessment of the assize of bread in medieval England. The Economic History Review, 57(3), 465-502. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3698543

Debarbieux, B., & Price, M. F. (2008). Representing mountains: From local and national to global common good. Geopolitics, 13(1), 148-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701783375

Dowbor, L., Esteves Rodrigues, A., & Panez Pinto, A. (2018). Reapropiaciones de los bienes comunes: Miradas críticas en torno a la gobernanza hídrica. Revista Rupturas, 8(2), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.22458/rr.v8i2.2112

Duke, G. (2016). The weak natural law thesis and the common good. Law and Philosophy, 35, 485-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-016-9270-4

Duke, G. (2017). Political authority and the common good. Political Studies, 65(4), 877-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717690767

Gao, H., & Lim, C. L. (2008). Saving the WTO from the risk of Irrelevance: The WTO dispute settlement mechanism as a “common good” for RTA disputes. Journal of International Economic Law, 11(4), 899-925. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgn036

Glesener, T. (2017). Can a common good be held in a pig? Ordinary conflicts over the ownership of assets of the souls in eighteenth century Spain. Politix, 119, 53-78. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.119.0053

Gostin, L. O., & Hodge, J. G. (2002). Personal privacy and common goods: a framework for balancing under the national health information privacy rule. Minnesota Law Review, 86(6), 1439-1479. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.346506

Gostin, L. O., Hodge, J. G., Introdu, R., Guar, A., Tomas, U. S., Tom, U. S., Konstanz, U., Cat, U., Claros, A. R., Cat, U., Guarin Ramírez, E. A., & Rojas Claros, A. (2018). Solidaridad, política social asistencial y bien común. Minnesota Law Review, 19(38), 1439-1479. https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.2840

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

Martins, B. C. (2011). Autoria, propriedade e compartilhamento de bens imateriais no capitalismo cognitivo. Liinc em Revista, 7(2), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v7i2.423

Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0108-y

Murphy, T. (2017). Justice and the common good in dispute resolution discourse in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Law and Development Review, 10(2), 305-339. https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2017-0016

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambrigde University Press.

Pinheiro, V. S., & Neiva, H. L. M. (2019). Razão prática, direito e bem comum na teoria da lei natural de John Finnis. Revista Quaestio Iuris, 12(2), 240-265. https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2019.39074

Prado, J. W., Alcântara, V. C., Carvalho, F. M., Vieira, K. C., Machado, L. K. C., & Tonelli, D. F. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: A bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968–2014). Scientometrics, 106(3), 1007-1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1829-6

Ramis, Á. O. (2017). Bienes comunes y democracia. LOM ediciones.

Renault, R. (2017). Refusing to pay taxes, defining the common good: Tax resistance and ordinary politics in eighteenth century Germany. Politix, 119, 79-100. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.119.0079

Saidel, M. (2017a). Definiendo lo común en la era neoliberal: Entre la expropiación y la institución de comunes. Millcayac: Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales, 4(6), 225-252.

Saidel, M. (2017b). La tragedia de los comunes revisitada: De la teoría formal a las formas históricas de desposesión. Temas y Debates, 33, 163-184. https://doi.org/10.35305/tyd.v0i33.359

Santos, B. S. (2020). A Cruel Pedagogia Do Vírus. Edições Almedina S/A.

Silveira, S. A., & Savazoni, R. T. (2018). The concept of the commons: Introductory notes. Liinc em Revista, 14(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v14i1.4150

Soma, K., & Vatn, A. (2014). Representing the common goods - Stakeholders vs. citizens. Land Use Policy, 41, 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015

Tonucci, J. B. M., Filho. (2017). Comum urbano: A cidade além do público e do privado (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/IGCC-B9BM6M

Tosun, J., Koos, S., Shore, J., Tosun, J., Koos, S., & Shore, J. (2017). Co-governing common goods : Interaction patterns of private and public actors. Policy and Society, 35(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.01.002

Tseng, Y. J., Hopfinger, A. J., & Esposito, E. X. (2012). The great descriptor melting pot: Mixing descriptors for the common good of QSAR models. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 26(1), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9511-4

Vieira, M. S. (2014). Os bens comuns intelectuais e a mercantilização (Tese de Dourado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/48/48134/tde-01102014-104738/pt-br.php

Wolkmer, M. D. F. S., & Ferrazzo, D. (2018). The paradox of development: Environmental law and common goods in capitalism. Veredas do Direito, 15(33), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v15i33.1269

Downloads

Published

2021-11-29

How to Cite

Machado, N. R. C., & Pereira, J. R. (2021). Commons, property law and management: A bibliometric study. Contextus - Contemporary Journal of Economics and Management, 19, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.71820

Issue

Vol. 19: jan/dec 2021

Section

Articles

License

 

The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:

We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.

Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.

We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.

Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.