Mobilizing adaptive competences in hackathon teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2022.78744Keywords:
hackathon, competences, adaptability, teams, open innovationAbstract
This paper aims at identifying the competences mobilized by team members in a Hackathon in the light of the adaptability theory, through a qualitative research with participants of an event organized by the Public Ministry of a state in Northeast Brazil to propose solutions to combat corruption. The data collection procedures involved non-participant observation and fourteen semi-structured interviews with members of five of the twenty teams that participated in the event. Five adaptive competences mobilized by the team members were identified: theoretical-practical knowledge; self-learning; problem solving; socio-emotional adaptability; and situational leadership. The findings contribute to the elaboration of management and people development programs in open innovation environments.
References
Abankwa, D. A., Rowlinson, S., & Adinyira, E. (2019). Conceptualizing team adaptability and project complexity: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2019.10.1.827
Alrasheedi, N. S., Sammon, D., & McCarthy, S. (2022). Understanding the characteristics of workforce transformation in a digital transformation context. Journal of Decision Systems, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2073636
Angarita, M. A. M., & Nolte, A. (2020). What do we know about Hackathon outcomes and how to support them? – A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing, 12324(LNISA), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58157-2_4
Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488210
Benson, A. J., Hardy, J., & Eys, M. (2016). Contextualizing leaders' interpretations of proactive followership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 949-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2077
Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., & Galati, F. (2020). The past, present and future of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1130-1161. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296
Bogers, M., Foss, N. J., & Lyngsie, J. (2018). The “human side” of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness. Research Policy, 47(1), 218-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.012
Bogers, M., Zobel, A, Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M. G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I. P., Moeslein, K. M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F. T., Radziwon, A., Rossi-Lamastra, C., Sims, J., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Briscoe, G., & Mulligan, C. (2014). Digital innovation: The Hackathon phenomenon. http://www.creativeworkslondon.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Digital-Innovation-The-Hackathon-Phenomenon1.pdf
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189-1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
Byrne, J. R., O’Sullivan, K., & Sullivan, K. (2017). An IoT and Wearable Technology Hackathon for Promoting Careers in Computer Science. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2626252
Chang, L. C., & Liu, C. H. (2008). Employee empowerment, innovative behavior and job productivity of public health nurses: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(10), 1442-1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.12.006
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232
Chatenier, E. D., Verstegen, J. A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R&D Management, 40(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1-12). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
Christian, J. S., Christian, M. S., Pearsall, M. J., & Long, E. C. (2017). Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 140, 62-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.003
Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M., & Wallin, M. W. (2021). How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward. Research Policy, 50(4), 104218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104218
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8
Del Giudice, M., G. Carayannis, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Soto-Acosta, P., & Meissner, D. (2018).The human dimension of open innovation. Management Decision, 56(6), 1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-950
Ferreira, G. D., & Farias, J. S. (2019). Hackathons no setor público brasileiro: Objetivos e resultados sob a ótica de agentes públicos promotores das iniciativas. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 17(1), 195-216. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.v17i1.39555
Godoy, A. S. (2013). Fundamentos da pesquisa qualitativa. In A. Takanashi (Org.), Pesquisa qualitativa em Administração: Fundamentos, métodos e usos no Brasil (pp. 35-49). São Paulo: Atlas.
Hafkesbrink, J., & Schroll, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational and individual competencies in open innovation: The dawn of a new research agenda. Journal of innovation Management, 2(1), 9-46. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_002.001_0004
Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: a meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162-179. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0034285
Jundt, D. K., Shoss, M. K., & Huang, J. L. (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S53-S71. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1955
Kollwitz, C., & Dinter, B. (2019). What the hack? – Towards a taxonomy of Hackathons. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Process Management, 11675, 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_23
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Watola, D. J., Jensen, J. M., Kim, B. H., & Botero, I. C. (2009). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership. In E. Salas, G. F. Goodwin & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Tea-m effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 113-155). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Le Boterf, G. (2003). Desenvolvendo a competência dos profissionais. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta‐analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
Li, Y., Yang, M. H., Klein, G., & Chen, H. G. (2011). The role of team problem solving competency in information system development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 911-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.09.004
Lin, T. C., Chen, C. M., Hsu, J. S. C., & Fu, T. W. (2015). The impact of team knowledge on problem solving competence in information systems development team. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1692-1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.007
Macêdo, J. W. D. L., & Silva, A. B. D. (2020). Construção e Validação de uma Escala de Competências Socioemocionais no Brasil. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 20(2), 965-973. http://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2020.2.17382
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80058-7
Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., & Sommer, S. A. (2015). Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998-2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 652-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.1001376
McPhillips, M., & Licznerska, M. (2021). Open Innovation Competence for a Future-Proof Workforce: A comparative study from four European universities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(6), 2442-2457. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060134
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and interpretation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nandi, A., & Mandernach, M. (2016). Hackathons as an Informal Learning Platform. SIGCSE ’16 – Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, Memphis/USA, 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844590
Park, S., & Park, S. (2020). How can employees adapt to change? Clarifying the adaptive performance concepts. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21411
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
Peris-Ortiz, M., Devece-Carañana, C. A., & Navarro-Garcia, A. (2018). Organizational learning capability and open innovation. Management Decision, 56(6), 1217-1231. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0173
Ployhart, R. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments, 6 (pp. 3–39). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(05)06001-7
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., & White, S. S. (2006). Adaptability in the workplace: Selecting an adaptive workforce. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments, 6, (pp. 41-71). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(05)06002-9
Raemdonck, I., Gijbels, D., & Van Groen, W. (2014). The influence of job characteristics and self‐directed learning orientation on workplace learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(3), 188-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12028
Reus, T. H., & Liu, Y. (2004). Rhyme and reason: Emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Human Performance, 17(2), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1702_6
Ribeiro, D. M., Dias Júnior., J. J. L. & Silva, F. Q. B. (2022). Escala de Desempenho Adaptativo: Adaptação e Evidências de Validade com Engenheiros de Software. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 22(2), 1867-1875.
Rodrigues, R. T., Guimarães, M. R. N., & Lara, F. F. (2022). Overview of Hackathons in Brazil. Revista Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas, 17(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v17i2.2809
Silva, A. B. (2009). Como os gerentes aprendem? São Paulo: Saraiva.
Stockdale, S. L., & Brockett, R. G. (2011). Development of the PRO-SDLS: A measure of self-direction in learning based on the personal responsibility orientation model. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(2), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741713610380447
Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K., & Irvin, V. (2019). Digital transformation is not about technology. Harvard Business Review, 13, 1-6.
Temiz, S. (2021). Open innovation via crowdsourcing: a digital only Hackathon case study from Sweden. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010039
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Wikhamn, B., Styhre, A., & Wikhamn, W. (2022). HRM work and open innovation: evidence from a case study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2054285
Yuan, Q., & Gasco-Hernandez, M. (2021). Open innovation in the public sector: creating public value through civic Hackathons. Public Management Review, 23(4), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1695884
Zarifian, P. (2001). Objetivo competência: Por uma nova lógica. São Paulo: Atlas.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.
3.png)
1.jpg)
1.jpg){kind=small}
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
2.png)
1.jpg)
2.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
