Nursing interventions and outcomes for pressure ulcer risk in critically ill patients

Autores

  • Luana Nunes Caldini
    • Renan Alves Silva
      • Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Melo
        • Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Pereira
          • Natasha Marques Frota
            • Joselany Áfio Caetano

              DOI:

              https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2017000500006

              Palavras-chave:

              Nursing Process, Nursing Care, Pressure Ulcer, Risk Factors, Intensive Care Units, Critical Care.

              Resumo

              Objective: to establish relationships between nursing interventions and outcomes for the diagnosis Pressure ulcer risk in critically ill patients. Methods: longitudinal study of 63 patients in an intensive care unit. An instrument with clinical data of patients and the Braden Scale were used. The cross-mapping technique was used to establish the nursing interventions and outcomes for each risk factor. Results: four intervention/outcome relationships were found for sensory perception; 11 for moisture; five for activity; six for nutrition; four for mobility; and three for friction/shear. Conclusion: thirty-three relationships related to the observed risk factors were found, with higher frequency of moisture. The relationships found with moisture were: urinary elimination, response to medication, wound healing: secondary intention, self-care: bathing, fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance, intestinal continence and tissue integrity: skin and mucous membranes.

              Downloads

              Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

              Downloads

              Publicado

              2017-11-21

              Edição

              Seção

              Carta ao Editor

              Como Citar

              1.
              Caldini LN, Silva RA, Melo GAA, Pereira FGF, Frota NM, Caetano J Áfio. Nursing interventions and outcomes for pressure ulcer risk in critically ill patients. Rev Rene [Internet]. 21º de novembro de 2017 [citado 13º de maio de 2026];18(5):598-605. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/30809