Análise de práticas na assistência ao parto e pós-parto hospitalar

Nivea Alane dos Santos Moura; Viviane Rolim de Holanda; Geyslane Pereira Melo de  Albuquerque; José Flávio de Lima  Castro; Hemelly Raially de Lira Silva; Elizama Paula Gomes da Rocha

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20202143671

Authors

Nivea Alane dos Santos Moura Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9174-9487
Viviane Rolim de Holanda Universidade Federal da Paraíba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-1800
Geyslane Pereira Melo de Albuquerque Universidade de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-8831
José Flávio de Lima Castro Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4755-8947
Hemelly Raially de Lira Silva Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-490X
Elizama Paula Gomes da Rocha Universidade Federal de Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-9814

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202143671

Keywords:

Nursing; Humanizing Delivery; Postpartum Period; Evidence-Based Practice; Midwifery.

Abstract

Objective: to analyze practices in childbirth and postpartum hospital care. Methods: cross-sectional study, conducted with 335 mothers in a reference maternity hospital. A form was used based on the indicators of the Bologna index and guidelines for childbirth and puerperium assistance. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-square, binomial and Clopper-Pearson tests), with p<0.05 being significant. Results: it was observed that 77.9% of the puerperal women considered professional assistance satisfactory. The presence of the doula (p=0.037) and breastfeeding in the first hour of life (p=0.032) had a significant relation with the evaluation of women. The Bologna index evaluation obtained an average of 2.6. Conclusion: there was a higher frequency of intermediate and inadequate practices in childbirth and postpartum care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mendes YMMB, Rattner D. Structure and practices in hospitals of the Apice ON Project: a baseline study. Rev Saude Publica. 2020; 54:23. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001497

Andrade FM, Castro JFL, Silva AV. Percepção das gestantes sobre as consultas médicas e de enfermagem no pré-natal de baixo risco. R Enferm Cent-O Min. 2016; 6(3):2377-388. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19175/recom.v6i3.1015

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Diretrizes nacionais de assistência ao parto normal: versão resumida [Internet]. 2017 [cited fev 13, 2020]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretrizes_nacionais_assistencia_parto_normal.pdf

Zanardo GLP, Uribe MC, Nadal AHR, Habigzang LF. Violência obstétrica no Brasil: uma revisão narrativa. Psicol Soc. 2017; 29:e155043. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2017v29155043

Ribeiro JF, Nascimento SS, Brito IA, Luz VLES, Coêlho DMM, Araújo KRS. Avaliação da assistência ao parto normal em uma maternidade pública. Rev Eletr Gestão Saúde. 2016; 7(1):65-81. doi: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rgs/article/view/3380

Monteiro MCM, Holanda VR, Melo GP. Análise do conceito parto humanizado de acordo com o método evolucionário de Rodgers. R Enferm Cent-O Min. 2017; 7:e1885. doi: http://seer.ufsj.edu.br/index.php/recom/article/view/1885/1808

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [Internet]. 2018 [cited Mar 13, 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/

Lopes GDC, Gonçalves AC, Gouveia HG, Armellini CJ. Attention to childbirth and delivery in a university hospital: comparison of practices developed after Network Stork. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2019; 27:e3139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2643-3139

Barbosa EM, Oliveira ASS, Galiza DDF, Barros VL, Aguiar VF, Marques MB. Socio-demographic and obstetric profile of pregnant women in a public hospital. Rev Rene. 2017; 18(2):227-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2017000200012

Cavalcanti TRL, Holanda VR. Participação paterna no ciclo gravídico-puerperal e seus efeitos sobre a saúde da mulher. Enferm Foco. 2019; 10(1):93-98 doi: https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2019.v10.n1.1446

Mouta RJO, Silva TMA, Melo PTS, Lopes NS, Moreira VA. Plano de parto como estratégia de empoderamento feminino. Rev Baiana Enferm. 2017; 31(4):e20275. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18471/rbe.v31i4.2027

Suárez-Cortés M, Armero-Barranco D, Canteras-Jordana M, Martínez-Roche ME. Use and influence of Delivery and Birth Plans in the humanizing delivery process. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2015; 23(3):520-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0067.2583

Lima SBG, Schirmer J, Dotto LMG, Santos CL. Obstetric practices adopted by a public maternity in Rio Branco-AC. Cogitare Enferm. 2018; 23(4):e53258. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v23i4.53258

Guida NFB, Pereira ALF, Lima GPV, Zveiter M, Araújo CLF, Moura MAV. Compliance of nursing care practices with technical recommendations for normal birth. Rev Rene. 2017; 18(4):543-50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2017000400017

Borja TJ, Freitas WMF, Santos LS, Nascimento BGS, Lima DRA, Silva JCMC. O Cuidado prestado por doulas em uma maternidade pública: o olhar das puérperas. R Enferm Cent-O Min. 2018; 8:e2878. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19175/recom.v8i0.2878

Lansky S, Souza KV, Peixoto ERM, Oliveira BF, Diniz CSG, Vieira NF, et al. Obstetric violence: influences of the senses of birth exhibition in pregnant women childbirth experience. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2019; 24(8):2811-23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.30102017

Pedroso CNLS, Lópes LC. À margem da humanização? Experiências de parto de usuárias de uma maternidade pública de Porto Alegre-RS. Physis Rev Saúde Coletiva. 2017; 27(4):1163-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312017000400016

Reis CSC, Souza D, Nogueira MFH, Proguinatti JM, Vargens OMC. Analysis of births attended by nurse midwives under the perspective of humanization of childbirth. J Res Fundam Care Online. 2016; 8(4):4972-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2016.v8i4.4972-4979