Tecnologias não invasivas na assistência às parturientes de alto risco: percepções de enfermeiras obstétricas

Lana Priscila Meneses Ares; Juliana Amaral Prata; Jane Marcia Progianti; Adriana Lenho de Figueiredo Pereira; Ricardo José Oliveira Mouta; Luísa Belém Amorim; Laura Greco Gioia

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20212261385

Authors

Lana Priscila Meneses Ares Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9436-6721
Juliana Amaral Prata Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-7595
Jane Marcia Progianti Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-5192
Adriana Lenho de Figueiredo Pereira Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2563-6174
Ricardo José Oliveira Mouta Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1284-971X
Luísa Belém Amorim Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-7713
Laura Greco Gioia Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-7169

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20212261385

Keywords:

Obstetric Nursing; Technology; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Nursing Care.

Abstract

Objective: to know nurse-midwives’ perceptions about factors related with the use of non-invasive care technologies in the care of high-risk parturient women. Methods: qualitative study, with 10 nurse-midwives from the obstetric center of a high-risk maternity hospital in a university hospital. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and subjected to content analysis. Results: prenatal care with a focus on female autonomy, the availability of specific materials and the sector’s infrastructure are facilitating factors. Work overload, the devaluation of nurse-midwives’ knowledge by some medical professionals and the lack of institutional support for teamwork are limiting factors. Conclusion: the factors referred to show the need to boost collaborative work in assisting high obstetric risk, encourage the use of non-invasive care technologies and improve nurses’ working conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shari Munch, Judith L. M. Munch S, McCoyd JLM, Curran L, Harmon C. Medically high-risk pregnancy: Women’s perceptions of their relationships with health care providers. Soc Work Health Care. 2020; 59(1):20-45. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2019.1683786

Meaney S, Lutomski JE, O’Connor L, O’Donoghue K, Greene RA. Women’s experience of maternal morbidity: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):184. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0974-0

Prata JA, Ares LPM, Vargens OMC, Reis CSC, Pereira ALF, Progianti JM. Non-invasive care technologies: nurses’ contributions to the demedicalization of health care in a high-risk maternity hospital. Esc Anna Nery. 2019; 23(2):e20180259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2018-0259

Amorim T, Araújo ACM, Guimarães EMP, Diniz SCF, Gandra HM, Candido MCRM. Perception of obstetric nurses on the care model and practice in a philanthropic maternity hospital. Rev Enferm UFSM. 2019; 9:1-17. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179769234868

Özberk H, Mete S, Bektaş M. Effects of relaxation-focused nursing care in women in preterm labor. Biol Res Nurs. 2020; I23(2):160-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800420941253

Reis TLR, Padoin SMM, Toebe TFP, Paula CC, Quadros JS. Women’s autonomy in the process of labour and childbirth: integrative literature review. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017; 38(1):e64677. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/19831447.2017.01.64677

Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2016.

Andrade IS, Castro RCMB, Moreira KAP, Santos CPRS, Fernandes AFC. Effects of technology on knowledge, attitude and practice of pregnant women for childbirth. Rev Rene. 2019; 20:e41341. doi: https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192041341

Thaeri M, Takian A, Taghizadeh Z, Jafari N, Sarafraz N. Creating a positive perception of childbirth experience: systematic review and metaanalysis of prenatal and intrapartum interventions. Reprod Health. 2018; 15(73):2-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0511-x

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Orientações para elaboração de projetos arquitetônicos Rede Cegonha: ambientes de atenção ao parto e nascimento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2018.

Dodou HD, Sousa AAS, Barbosa EMG, Rodrigues DP. Delivery room: working conditions and assistance humanization. Cad Saúde Coletiva. 2017; 25(3):332-8. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201700030082

Progianti JM, Moreira NJMP, Prata JA, Vieira MLC, Almeida TA, Vargens OMC. Job insecurity among obstetric nurses. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2018; 26:e33846. doi: https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2018.33846

Biondi HS, Pinho EC, Kirchhof ALC, Rocha LP, Barlem ELD, Kerber NPC. Psychic workload in the process of work of maternity and obstetric centers nurses. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2018; 39:e64573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.64573

Oliveira VJ, Penna CMM. Ethos and pathos in the delivery room. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017; 38(2):e67761. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.02.67761

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2016; 4:CD004667. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5

College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Exe- cutive summary: collaboration in practice: implementing team-based care: report of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists’ task force on collaborative practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127(3):612-7. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001304

Melkamu E, Woldemariam S, Haftu A. Inter-professional collaboration of nurses and midwives with physicians and associated factors in Jimma University specialized teaching hospital, Jimma, south West Ethiopia, 2019: cross sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2020; 19:33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00426-w

Behruzi1 R, Klam S, Dehertog M, Jimenez V, Hatem M. Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):200. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x

Saad DEA, Riesco MLG. Autonomia profissional da enfermeira obstétrica. Rev Paul Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [cited Jan 21, 2021];29(1-2-3):11-20. Available from: http://repen.com.br/revista/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Autonomia-profissional-da-enfermeira-obst%C3%A9trica.pdf

Romijn A, Teunissen PW, Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Groot CJM. Interprofessional collaboration among care professionals in obstetrical care: are perceptions aligned? BMJ Qual Saf. 2018; 27:279-86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006401