Panorama da produção científica sobre autocuidado de pessoas com estomia: revisão bibliométrica

Claudiomiro da Silva Alonso; Eline Lima Borges

doi:10.36517/2175-6783.20252695408

Authors

Claudiomiro da Silva Alonso Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-1812
Eline Lima Borges Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-5308

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36517/2175-6783.20252695408

Keywords:

Self Care; Bibliometrics; Ostomy; Scientific Publication Indicator.

Abstract

Objective: to map the scientific production on self-care among people with ostomy. Methods: a bibliometric review was conducted, encompassing publications from 2009 to 2024 related to self-care in individuals with ostomy. Data were collected from the BDENF, LILACS, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL databases. Indexed articles linked to Brazil were included. Analyses were performed using the VOSviewer software. Results: a total of 241 articles were included, with the main descriptors being nursing care, quality of life, stomatherapy, women, children, validation studies, and distance education. Two authors stood out for their volume of production, one from the Southeast region and another from the Northeast region. Scientific output is concentrated among research groups affiliated with universities, but without the establishment of a collaborative network. Conclusion: there has been an increase in scientific production, although it remains concentrated in groups that do not establish collaborative networks. Self-care in individuals with ostomy is associated with a variety of themes, indicating researchers' intention to address this phenomenon in its entirety. Contributions to practice: the findings reveal gaps and underexplored topics, highlighting the need to develop joint research agendas to enhance evidence on self-care for people with ostomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Beigel F, Packer AL, Gallardo O, Salatino M. OLIVA: the scientific output in journals edited in Latin America. Disciplinary diversity, institutional collaboration, and multilingualism in SciELO and Redalyc (1995-2018). Dados Rev Ciênc Sociais. 2024;67(1):e20210174. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/dados.2024.67.1.307x

2. Alcalá-Albert GJ, Parra-González ME. Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on nursing research in the Web of Science. Educ Sci. 2021;11(9):455. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090455

3. Yanbing S, Hua L, Chao L, Fenglan W, Zhiguang D. The state of nursing research from 2000–2019: a global analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77:162-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14564

4. Malta DC, Gomes CS, Veloso GA, Souza JB, Oliveira PPV, Ferreira AVL, et al. The burden of Noncommunicable Diseases in Portuguese Language Countries. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2023;28(5):1549-62. http://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023285.11622022

5. Jorge TV, Marques ADB, Mourão LF, Pinheiro RM, Silva AL, Lopes DGLZ. Sociodemographic and clinical profile of people with a stoma due to oncological cause: observational study. Braz J Enterostomal Ther. 2023;21:e1313. doi: https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v21.1313_PT

6. Maillard D, Brandão ES, Jesus PBR, Gatto FS. Nursing consultation tools for people with elimination stomas in Brazil: a scoping review. Braz J Enterostomal Ther. 2024;22:e1483. doi: https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v22.1483_PT

7. Brady RRW, Scott J, Grieveson S, Aibibula M, Cawson M, Marks T, et al. Complications and healthcare costs associated with the first year following colostomy and ileostomy formation: a retrospective study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023;50(6):475-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001028

8. Paula MAB, Moraes JT. Consenso Brasileiro de Cuidado às Pessoas Adultas com Estomias de Eliminação 2020 [Internet]. 2021 [cited Mar 13, 2025]. Available from: https://sobest.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/CONSENSO_BRASILEIRO.pdf

9. Göttgens I, Oertelt-Prigione S. Gender as a contextual factor in quality of life of cancer survivors: a literature review. Oncol Res Treat. 2025;48(1-2):48-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000543067

10. Marcomini I, Iovino P, Rasero L, Manara DF, Vellone E, Villa G. Self-care and quality of life of ostomy patients: a structural equation modeling analysis. Nurs Rep. 2024;14(4):3417-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040247

11. Silva IP, Diniz IV, Sena JF, Lucena SKP, Do O’ LB, Dantas RAN, et al. Self-care requisites for people with intestinal ostomies: a scoping review. Aquichan. 2023;23(2):e2325. doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2023.23.2.5

12. Ferreira SRM, Correa Júnior AJS, Teles AAST, Aguiar JC, Sonobe HM, Santana ME. Maternal challenges in care for the child with intestinal ostomy grounding the proposal of a booklet. Saúde Coletiva (Barueri). 2022;12(83):11234-2047. doi: http://doi.org/10.36489/saudecoletiva.2022v12i83p11234-12047

13. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

14. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Portaria no 400, de 16 de novembro de 2009 [Internet]. 2009 [cited Mar 13, 2025]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/sas/2009/prt0400_16_11_2009.html

15. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (BR). Resolução COFEN nº 358/2009 – Revogada pela Resolução COFEN nº 736/2024. Dispõe sobre a Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem e a implementação do Processo de Enfermagem em ambientes, públicos ou privados, em que ocorre o cuidado profissional de Enfermagem, e dá outras providências [Internet]. 2009 [cited Mar 13, 2025]. Available from:: https://www.cofen.gov.br/resoluo-cofen-3582009/

16. Panayotova P. Science popularisation as diffusion of knowledge? Public Underst Sci. 2024;33(6):676-91. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636625241246085

17. Barría P, Mauricio R. Nursing research, dissemination of knowledge and its potential contribution to the practice. Investig Educ Enferm. 2022; 40(3):e01. doi: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e01

18. Lisboa CR, Spira JAO, Borges EL. Self-care concept for people with elimination ostomy: a scoping review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024;58:e20240041. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0041en

19. Tanaka M. Orem’s nursing self-care deficit theory: a theoretical analysis focusing on its philosophical and sociological foundation. Nurs Forum. 2022;57(3):480-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12696

20. Bozkul G, Celik SS, Nur Arslan H. Nursing interventions for the self-efficacy of ostomy patients: a systematic review. J Tissue Viability. 2024;33(2):165-73. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.04.006

21. Soares-Pinto IE, Queirós S, Alves P, Carvalho T, Santos C, Brito MA. Nursing interventions to promote self-care in a candidate for a bowel elimination ostomy: scoping review. Aquichan. 2022;22(1):e2212. doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2022.22.1.2

22. Carneiro AF, Oliveira AR, Ribeiro WA, Grassel CS, Klein LC, Guedes MMF, et al. Contributos da estomaterapia para assistência de enfermagem a pessoa com estomia intestinal. Braz J Sci. 2024;3(1):183-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.14295/bjs.v3i1.487

23. Ertürk EB, Ari H, Üstündağ Ç, Yilmaz E, Topdemir Ü. Factors influencing daily living and ostomy self-care management in ostomates: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17676

24. Paul JC, Zimnicki K, Pieper BA. Encountering ostomies in acute care: peristomal skin changes. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2023;36(1):54-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000897288.52973.e1

25. Erazo RMG, Carballo FHE. Systematic review: quality of life in ostomy patient. Interam J Health Sci. 2024;4:150. doi: https://doi.org/10.59471/ijhsc2024150

26. Down G, Bain K, Andersen BD, Martins L, Karlsmark T, Jemec G, et al. Clinical preventive-based best practices to reduce the risk of peristomal skin complications – an international consensus report. WCET J. 2023;43(1):11-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.33235/wcet.43.1.11-19

27. Eufrasio VBS, Feitosa YSF, Sampaio LRL, Macedo LFR, Girondi JBR, Marques ADB. Nurseostomy: an instrument for nursing assessment of individuals with intestinal stomas in a hospital setting. Estima Braz J Enterostomal Ther. 2024;22:e1463. doi: https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v22.1463_PT

28. Perissotto S, Silva VA, Bezerra SMG, Girondi JBR, Villa G, Gasparino RC. Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the measurement properties of the Ostomy Self-Care Index in the Brazilian culture. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2024;33:e20230355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2023-0355en

29. Paczek RS, Tanaka AKS R, Brum BN, Brito DT, Alexandre EM, Agostini AGF. Elaboração de cartilha de orientação para pacientes com estomas de eliminação. Rev Eletr Acervo Saúde. 2021;13(3):e7002. doi: https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e7002.2021

30. Silva IP, Diniz IV, Freitas LS, Salvador PTCO, Sonobe HM, Mesquita SKC, et al. Development of a mobile application to support self-care for people with intestinal stomas. Rev Rene. 2023;24:e81790. doi:https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20232481790

31. Riegel B, Dunbar SB, Fitzsimons D, Freedland KE, Lee CS, Middleton S, et al. Self-care research: Where are we now? Where are we going? Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;116:103402. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103402

32. Castilhos C, Ferreira F, Silva F, Pavão C. Reflexões a respeito do financiamento das iniciativas de acesso aberto: analisando as políticas de taxas de processamento de artigos e de financiamento público em periódicos brasileiros. Rev Comun Inform. 2022;25:63142. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5216/ci.v25.70326

33. Ribeiro DB, Oliveira EFA, Garcia MLT. Retrocessos no financiamento da ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil: o caso do CNPq. Serv Soc Soc. 2023;146(3):e6628326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-6628.326

34. Pelegrini T, França MTA. Endogenia acadêmica: insights sobre a pesquisa brasileira. Estud Econ. 2020;50(4):573-610. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-41615041tpmf