The profile of women attended in gynaecological nursing consultations in primary health care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/2175-6783.20262796430Keywords:
Women’s Health; Primary Health Care; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Office Nursing.Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the profile of women attended in gynaecological nursing consultations within the context of primary health care. Methods: this cross-sectional, analytical study conducted through the analysis of 135 medical records of women aged 25-64 years who underwent gynaecological nursing consultations. A validated instrument was used for data collection. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential approaches. Results: adult, married women with low educational levels predominated, mostly engaged in domestic work and with income considered sufficient. Chronic diseases, family conflicts, frequent religious practice, and high adherence to contraceptive methods were identified, contrasting with low use of dual protection and limited knowledge about cervical cancer screening. Considerable gaps in the records of family and sexual violence, as well as a high proportion of incomplete data, were observed. Conclusion: the identified profile reveals social and health vulnerabilities that impact women’s care and highlights the need for educational strategies, sensitive care, and a comprehensive approach. Contributions to practice: the study supports improvements in care processes, enhances the use of standardised instruments, and strengthens the role of nurses in promoting comprehensive, equitable, women-centred care based on their real needs.
Downloads
References
1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria conjunta SAES/SECTICS nº 13, de 29 de julho de 2025. Aprova as Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Rastreamento do Câncer de Colo do Útero: Parte I - Rastreamento organizado utilizando testes moleculares para detecção de DNA-HPV Oncogênico [Internet]. 2025 [cited Dec 15, 2025]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/pcdt/r/rastreamento-cancer-do-colo-do-utero/view
2. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde: Anexo I da Portaria de Consolidação nº 2/2017 [Internet]. 2018 [cited Dec 17, 2025]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/politica_nacional_promocao_saude.pdf
3. Sanabria CAP, Delgado RE, Silva MB. Produção científica sobre prevenção e tratamento do câncer de colo de útero, 2009 a 2019. Physis. 2025; 35(3):e35031. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312025350311pt
4. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention, second edition: use of mRNA tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) [Internet]. 2023 [cited Dec 19, 2025]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030824
5. Lopes ASF, Romualdo GR, Pinhati MES, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Tsunoda AT, Cândido EB, et al. Exploring cervical cancer mortality in Brazil: an ecological study on socioeconomic and healthcare factors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025;35(6):101851. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005738
6. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (COFEN). Resolução COFEN Nº 736 de 17 de Janeiro de 2024 [Internet]. 2024 [cited Mar 3, 2026]. Available from: https://www.cofen.gov.br/resolucao-cofen-no-736-de-17-de-janeiro-de-2024/
7. Deschodt M, Heeren P, Cerulis M, Duerinckx N, Pape E, Achterberg T, et al. The effect of consultations performed by specialised nurses or advanced nurse practitioners on patient and organisational outcomes in patients with complex health conditions: an umbrella review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;158:104840. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104840
8. Chini LT, Freire BSM, Leonel GA, Souza IS, Cunha MHSS, Costa, ICP, et al. Instrumento de consulta de enfermagem ginecológica na atenção primária à saúde. In: Chini LT, Costa ICP. Guia prático na atenção primária à saúde: instrumentos para a consulta de enfermagem e prática clínica. Paraná: São José dos Pinhais; 2023. p. 107-17.
9. Ukoha WC, Mtshali NG. Preconception care practices among primary health care nurses working in public health facilities in KwaZulu-Natal. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2022;15(1):2112395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2112395
10. Ferreira NJ, Souza GG, Cestari MEW, Pinto KTF. Perfil das mulheres que realizaram exame de Papanicolaou em uma unidade de saúde no interior do Paraná. Rev Uningá. 2020;57(4):67-75. doi: http://doi.org/10.46311/2318-0579.57.eUJ3166
11. Lopez KN, Baker-Smith C, Flores G, Gurvitz M, Karamlou T, Gallegos FN, et al. Addressing social determinants of health and mitigating health disparities across the lifespan in congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(8):e025358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025358
12. Gomes AB, Rangel RF, Linck CL, Luz EMF, Munhoz OL, Ilha S. Knowledge of aged women about Sexually Transmitted Infections. Rev Rene. 2024; 25:e93232. doi: https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20242593232
13. O’neil A, Russel JD, Thompson K, Martinson ML, Peters SAE. The impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on women’s health over the lifetime. Maturitas. 2020;140:1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.001
14. Cunha VF, Pillon SC, Zafar S, Wagstaff C, Scorsolini-Comin F. Brazilian nurses’ concept of religion, religiosity, and spirituality: a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2020;22(4)1161-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12788
15. Shrestha S, Shrestha R, Shrestha S, Koju, P, Shrestha A. Hormonal contraceptives use and their adverse effects: a cross-sectional study among the women visiting tertiary care center. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2020;18(3)296-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v18i3.49228
16. Campbell AJ, Claydon VE Liva S, Cote AT. Changes in Canadian contraceptive choices: results of a national survey on hormonal contraceptive use. BMC Womens Health. 2025;25(1):147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03597-3
17. Paulsen A, Vistad I, Fegran L. Gynecological cancer survivors’ experiences with sexual health communication in nurse-led follow-up consultations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;103(3):551-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14749
18. Briscoe S, Coon JT, Melendez-Torres GJ, Abbott R, Shaw L, Nunns M, et al. Primary care clinicians’ perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review. BJGP Open. 2024;8(1):BJGPO.2023.0133. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S431365
19. Rocha MDH, Morais JB, Andrade BB, Cavalcante PAM, Rocha PFA, Saiter R. Prevenção do câncer de colo uterino na consulta de enfermagem. Cereus. 2020;12(1):50-63. doi: http://doi.org/10.18605/2175-7275/cereus.v12n1p50-63
20. Gülbahar AK; Eda Kİ, Asiye K. Associations of ehealth literacy with cervical cancer and human papillomavirus awareness among women in türkiye: a cross-sectional study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2025;43(7):e01314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001314
21. Mohammed E, Mirgissa K, Taye G, Assefa M, Jemal A, Addissie A. Reasons for not undergoing cervical cancer screening: perspectives from women and health care providers in Addis Ababa: a qualitative study. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1456804. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1456804
22. Fang J, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Yang Q. How delays in seeking medical care for cervical cancer patients are affected by their health-seeking behaviour: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):2881. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23783-0
23. Kajabwangu R, Izudi J, Bazira J, Ssedyabane F, Turanzomwe S, Birungi A, et al. Effect of metabolic syndrome and its components on the risk and prognosis of cervical cancer: a literature review. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024;54:101438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2024.101438
24. Costa JG, Amaral AL, Tavares JB, Oliveira AK, Cunha ACR, Silva JC, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and multimorbidity patterns in climacteric women with hypertension. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025;22(9):1360. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091360
25. Charlete PMA, Neves DBS, Neves ALM, Souza Filho ZA, Nina SFM, Correa RGF. Fatores associados ao consumo alimentar de gestantes de alto risco. Scire Salutis. 2023;13(1):84-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.6008/CBPC2236-9600.2023.001.0009
26. Hollingdrake O, Alban CA, Currie J. A qualitative study exploring service users’ perspectives of the impact of a community-based nurse-led domestic violence service on women’s access to healthcare. BMC Nurs. 2023;24(1):897. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03397-y
27. Prieto-Atiénzar M, Dhollande S, Clarke KA. Conceptualizing domestic violence within clinical documentation. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024; 11:23333936241271165. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333936241271165
28. Garcia NP, Lettiere-Viana A, Santos F, Matumoto S, Kawata LS, Freitas KD. The nursing process in postpartum consultations at Primary Health Care Units. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021;55:e03717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2020005103717
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the entire dataset supporting the results is available within the body of the article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thaline Reis Tavares, Adriana Dias, Patricia Mônica Ribeiro, Christianne Alves Pereira Calheiros, Anna Paula Mendes Marques de Lima Franco, Patrícia Scotini Freitas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
