Factors related to non-adherence to the realization of the Papanicolaou test

Autores/as

  • Márcia Aparecida dos Santos Silva
    • Érica Mairene Bocate Teixiera
      • Rosangela Aparecida Pimenta Ferrari
        • Maria Elisa Wotzasek Cestari
          • Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Cardelli

            DOI:

            https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2015000400010

            Palabras clave:

            Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Papanicolaou Test, Primary Health Care, Women’s Health.

            Resumen


            Objective: to identify reasons for low adherence to the Papanicolaou test in women seeking care in primary health care. Methods: cross-sectional study. Data collection carried out during home visits, applying questionnaire to characterize sociodemographic aspects as well as the reasons for non-adherence to examination and suggestions for facilitating adherence. Results: among 169 women, 67% were of reproductive age and 73.9% have finished elementary school. The failure to previously scheduled examination was due mainly to the beliefs and attitudes (36.1%) and service organization (25.4%). The feelings reported by women during the Papanicolaou test were shame (55.6%), discomfort (32.5%) and pain (20.7%). Conclusion: Although the screening of cervical cancer is essential for timely intervention, a significant proportion of women still does not adhere to examination by myths and taboos, beliefs, and health attitudes, as well as service organization.

            Descargas

            Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

            Biografía del autor/a

            • Maria Elisa Wotzasek Cestari

            Descargas

            Publicado

            2015-08-04

            Número

            Sección

            Artigos de Pesquisa

            Cómo citar

            1.
            Silva MA dos S, Teixiera Érica MB, Ferrari RAP, Cestari MEW, Cardelli AAM. Factors related to non-adherence to the realization of the Papanicolaou test. Rev Rene [Internet]. 2015 Aug. 4 [cited 2026 Jun. 8];16(4):532-9. Available from: https://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2654