Syntactic and semantic aspects in the expression of a thesis by Anaximander of Miletus

Authors

  • Miguel López-Astorga

Keywords:

Anaximander of Miletus. Infinity. linguistic expression. Semantics. Syntax.

Abstract

Nowadays, there is an interesting controversy about the factors or elements that are more important in the human mind. In this way, while certain frameworks claim that the intellectual activity is mainly syntactic, other approaches insist that our mind basically takes semantic representations into account. There is no doubt that this discussion can make sense in cognitive science and in the studies on human reasoning. However, the essential aim of this paper is to show that this debate is irrelevant from the linguistic point of view, since even very abstract and complex ideas can be captured by means of both syntactic forms and semantic models, with the possibility of identifying clear relationships between such forms and models too. This last point is supported with arguments based on the thesis about infinity by Anaximander of Miletus, which is used as an example.

Author Biography

Miguel López-Astorga

Professor e pesquisador da University of Talca - Chile.

References

CERVIO, P. Anaximandro. In: FERNÁNDEZ LABASTIDA, F. & MERCADO, J. A. (Eds.). Philosophica: Enciclopedia filosófica on line, 2014. Available on: http://www. philosophica.info/archivo/2014/voces/anaximandro/Anaximandro.html [January 18th, 2018].

CHERNISS, H. F. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1935.

HENLÉ, M. On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, v. 69, 1962. p. 366-378.

JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. Against logical form. Psychologica Belgica, v. 5, n. 3/4, 2010. p. 193-221.

______. Inference with mental models. In: HOLYOAK, K. J. & MORRISON, R. G. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.

______., KHEMLANI, S., & GOODWIN, G. P. Logic, probability, and human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 19, n. 4, 2015. p. 201-214.

KIRK, G. S. & RAVEN, J. E. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. London, UK, & New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

KRIPKE, S. A. Semantical considerations in modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, v. 16, 1963a. p. 83-94.

______. Semantical analysis of modal logic I: Normal modal propositional calculi. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9, 1963b. p. 67-96.

______. Semantical analysis of modal logic II: Non-normal modal propositional calculi. In: ADDISON, J. W., HENKIN, L., & TARSKI, A. (Eds.). The Theory of Models:

Proceedings of the 1963 International Symposium at Berkeley. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co, 1965.

LÓPEZ-ASTORGA, M. Mental models are compatible with logical forms. In: LÓPEZ- VARELA AZCÁRATE, A. (Ed.). Interdisciplinary Approaches to Semiotics. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2017a.

______. Thales of Miletus and the semantic possibilities of his view of the soul. Aisthema, IV(1), 2017b. 101-112.

O’BRIEN, D. P. Conditionals and disjunctions in mental-logic theory: A response to Liu and Chou (2012) and to López-Astorga (2013). Universum, v. 29, n. 2, 2014. p. 221-235.

PEIRCE, C. S. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. HARTSHORNE, C., WEISS, P., & BURKS, A. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958.

QUELHAS, A. C., RASGA, C., & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. A priori true and false conditionals. Cognitive Science, v. 41, n. 55, 2017. p. 1003-1030.

REALE, G. Storia della filosofia antica, Volume I. Dalle origini a Socrate. Milan, Italy: Vita e Pensiero, 1987.

RIPS, L. J. The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press, 1994.

Published

2018-11-29

Issue

Section

Artigos