Elenchus and moral education on Plato’s Sophist

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36517/Argumentos.26.4

Keywords:

Plato. Sophist. Refutation. Moral Education. Ignorance.

Abstract

One of Socrates' striking features is his way of inquiring. Through investigation supported by a series of questions interspersed with the answers of an interlocutor, Socrates follows a path of negation of the theses presented to them until reaching a total impasse in this search. Socrates calls elenchos (refutation) his usual procedure and it was well known for what is presented to us in Plato's first dialogues. On the other hand, in the Sophist dialogue, in the sixth definition, the association of elenchos with sophistic activity is also presented as an educational method. These two cases are a matter of debate among scholars, they consider that the elenchos in this passage of the Sophist is not the same method as Plato's first dialogues, mainly because it is considered an educational method; but the elenchos of the first dialogues would only serve to show that the interlocutor holds conflicting opinions on the moral issues We pretend, therefore, to show that Plato is not presenting a new understanding of the elenchos and yet that it was already thought of as an educational method in previous dialogues.

Author Biography

José Wilson da Silva

Professor substituto da Universidade Estadual do Ceará e Professor Colaborador do Mestrado Acadêmico em Filosofia da Universidade Estadual do Ceará. Pós-doutorado, Doutorado e Mestrado em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo,

References

BRANWOOD, L. Stylometry and Chronology. In The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Ed. Richard Kraut. Cambridge University Press, 1992.

DORTER, K. “Diaresis and the Tripartite Soul in the Sophist,”. In Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 10, pp. 41–61, 1990.

GENDRON, C. Reconsidering Socrates' Influence on Moral Education through the Elenchus. In Philosophical Inquiry in Education, Vol. 12, N0 2, 1999.

KAHN, C. H. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

LOTT, M. Ignorance, Shame and Love of Truth: diagnosing the sophist's error in Plato's Sophist. In Phoenix, Vol. 66, No 1/2, 2012, pp. 36-56.

NOTOMI, N. The Unity of Plato's Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

PLATON. Le Sophiste. Tradução: Nestor L. Cordero. Paris: GF Flammarion, 1993.

TREVASKIS, J. R. The Sophistry of Noble Lineage (Plato, "Sophistes 230a5-23269”). In Phronesis, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1955, pp. 36-49.

Zaks, N. Socratic Elenchus in the Sophist. In Apeiron 2018; 51(4): 371–390.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-08

Issue

No. 26 (2021)

Section

Artigos

License

Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.

The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion

1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.