Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36517/Argumentos.28.3

Keywords:

Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation.

Author Biography

Delmo Mattos, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA)

Professor da Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA). Tem estágio de pós-doutorado em Teoria do Direito e Doutorado em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2008). Atua como Professor Permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente (UniCEUMA) e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito e Instituições do Sistema de Justiça, vinculado a Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA). Pesquisador do Grupo de Pesquisa Contratualismo Moral e Político (UFRRJ) e líder do Grupo de Pesquisa Justiça, Poder e Relações Éticas na Contemporaneidade (UniCEUMA). Desde 2010 é membro do Núcleo Estruturante do GT Hobbes, da ANPOF.  Os principais objetos de pesquisa são: Contratualismo Político, Ética aplicada, Bioética, Biodireito, Ética e justiça ambiental, a problemática da Justiça, da violência e do poder em seus diferentes desdobramentos no âmbito da Filosofia e do Direito.

References

BOBBIO, Norberto. Thomas Hobbes. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1991.

COPP, David. Hobbes on Artificial Persons and Collective Actions. The Philosophical Review, v. 89, n. 4, p. 579-606, oct./1980.

DOUGLASS, Robin. The Body Politic ‘is a fictitious body’: Hobbes on Imagination and Fiction. Hobbes Studies, v. 27, n. 2, p. 126-47, 2014.

HOBBES, Thomas. Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968.

HOBBES, Thomas. Os elementos da Lei natural e Política. Tradução de Bruno Simões. São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes, 2010.

HOOD, F. C. The Change in Hobbes’s Definition of Liberty. The Philosophical Quarterly, v. 17, n. 67, p. 150-163, 1967.

JAKONEN, Mikko. Multitude in Motion: Re-Readings on the Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2013.

JAUME, Lucien. Hobbes et l’État représentatif moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1986.

MATTOS, Delmo. Pactos, palavras e ações em Thomas Hobbes. Belo Horizonte: Editora Dialética. 2020.

OLSTHOORN, Johan. Leviathan. Inc.: Hobbes on the nature and person of the state. History of European Ideas, v. 47, n. 1, 17-32, 2021.

POLIN, Raymond. Politique et philosophie politique chez Hobbes. Paris: P.U.F., 1953.

LEIVAS, Claudio. A visão de Leviatã representação, afecção e vontade na filosofia natural e política de Hobbes. Porto Alegre: Class, 2019.

PITKIN, Hanna F. The Concept of Representation”. Londres: University of California Press, 1984.

RUNCIMAN, D. Hobbes’s theory of representation: anti-democratic or protodemocratic? In: SHAPIRO, S.; WOOD, K. (Eds.). Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

SKINNER, Quentin. Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State. Journal of Political Philosophy 7, n. 1,1999.

ZARKA, Y. Hobbes e a invenção da vontade política pública. Discurso, n. 32, p. 71-84, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-01

Issue

No. 28 (2022)

Section

Artigos

License

Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.

The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion

1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.