INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E A INDÚSTRIA DE PRODUÇÃO FILOSÓFICA: OTIMISMO OU PESSIMISMO?

Luís Estevinha Rodrigues

doi:10.30611/2024n34id94585

Autores/as

Luís Estevinha Rodrigues https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-2756

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30611/2024n34id94585

Palabras clave:

inteligência artificial, filosofia, academia, produção

Resumen

Explico a inevitabilidade de um cenário em que a atual indústria de produção filosófica se cruza com a inteligência artificial geral. Defende-se que esta última terá um impacto não negligenciável sobre a primeira, algo que os decisores devem antecipar e preparar. Proponho uma posição equilibrada a este respeito, uma atitude prudencial entre o pessimismo e o otimismo, bem como a substituição de um desiderato de quantidade nesta indústria por um desiderato de qualidade.

Citas

ABOULAFIA M. The Productivity Syndrome (or why I stopped writing philosophy), https://upnight.com/2018/05/31/the-productivity-syndrome-or-why-i-stopped-writing-philosophy.

BARRAT, J. Our final invention: artificial intelligence and the end of the human era. NewYork, St. Martin’s Press, 2013.

BISHOP, J. Artificial Intelligence Is Stupid and Causal Reasoning Will Not Fix It. In: Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 2021., 1-18 online.

BORNMANN, L., HAUNSCHILD, L., MUTZ, R. Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. In Humanit Soc Sci. 224, 2021. doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00903.

BOSTROM, N. Deep utopia, life and meaning in a solved world. Washington DC. Ideapress Publishing. 2024.

BOSTROM, N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2014.

BRODERICK, D. The Spike: how our lives are being transformed by rapidly advancing technologies. New York, A Forge Book - Tom Doherty Associates, LLC. 2021.

CARDON, A. Artificial consciousness, artificial emotions, and autonomous robots. Cogn Process. 7(4), 2006, P245-267.

CHALMERS, David, The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. in “Could artificial intelligence really out-think us (and would we want it to)? In Uziel Awret, David Chalmers, eds., The Singularity Could artificial intelligence really out-think us (and would we want it to? Imprint Academic Ltd., 3-32. 2016.

CHOMSKY, N. The False Promise of ChatGPT. In: The New York times. 2023, march 8).

DEBOUCHE, N. Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3). In: Ethics in Ethics science and environmental politics. Vol. 21, 2021. P. 17–23.

DIGNUM, V. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer. 2019.

DOMINGOS, Pedro. The master algorithm: how the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. Filadelfia, Perseus Group. 2015.

EISIKOVITS. N., FELDMAN, D. IN: Moral Philosophy and Politics. 9. 2022, p. 181–199.

FLORIDI, L. Devemos ter medo da inteligência artificial? https://aeon.co/essays/true-ai-is-both-logically-possible-and-utterly-implausible. 2015.

FLORIDI, L., COWLS, J., KING,T., TADDEO, M. How to design AI for social good: seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2020.

FORTUNATO, S., BERGSTROM C., BORNER, K., EVANS, J., HELBING, D., MILOSEVIC, S., PETERSEN, A., RADICCHI, F., SINATRA, R., UZZI, B., VESPIGNANI, A., WALTMAN, L., WANG, D., BARABÁSI, A., Science of science. In: Science. 2018. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185. PMID: 29496846; PMCID: PMC5949209.

GARFIELD, E. What is the primordial reference for the phrase 'Publish or perish'? The Scientist Vol.10. 1996.

GOLEMAN, D. Inteligência emocional, a teoria revolucionária que redefine o que é ser inteligente. tradução Marcos Santarrita. Rio de Janeiro. Objetiva, 2011.

GOOD, John. Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. In F. Alt & M. Ruminoff (eds.), Advances in Computers, volume 6. Academic Press. 31-88. 1966.

HARTMAN, R. The Logical Difference Between Philosophy and Science. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1963, Vol. 23, No. 3. 1963, p. 353-379.

HORKHEIMER, M., ADORNO T. The dialectic of Enlightment - Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid. Stanford. Stanford University Press. 2002.

INNES. C. The Cambridge Companion to Bernard Shaw. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1998.

KAHN, S. Brave New Words, How Al Will Revolutionize Education (and Why That's a Good Thing). New York. Viking. 2024.

KUHN, T. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.1977.

KURZWEIL., R. The Singularity is Near. New York: Viking Press, 2005.

LANDGREBE, Jobst; SMITH, Barry. Why machines will never rule the world: artificial intelligence without fear. New York. Routledge, 2023.

MAY. T. Transformations in Academic Production, Content, Context and Consequence In: European Journal of Social Theory. 8(2). 2005. p 193–209.

MINSKY, M. Will Robots Inherit the Earth? Scientific American, Oct, 1994. http://www.inf.ufsc.br/~mauro.roisenberg/ine6102/leituras/Will%20Robots%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.htm. Transcrição consultada em 20/4/2024.

MORIOKA, M. Can Artificial Intelligence Philosophize? In: The Review of Life Studies, Vol.12, 2021. p. 40-41.

NASSI-CALÒ. L. Como se utilizam as altmetrias para avaliar a produção científica da América Latina. 2022. https://blog.scielo.org/blog/2022/02/09/como-se-utilizam-as-altmetrias-para-avaliar-a-producao-cientifica-da-america-latina. Consultado em 2024.

NEWBORN, M. Kasparov versus Deep Blue: Computer Chess Comes of Age. New York. Springer. 1997.

PAULUS, F., CRUZ, N., SOREN, K. The Impact Factor Fallacy. In: Conceptual Analysys, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487.

PRICE, D. Little Science, Big Science… and Beyond. New York. Columbia University Press. 1986.

RUSSELL. B. O elogio do ócio, Tradução de Pedro Júnior. Rio de Janeiro, (1935) 2002.

SAYGIN, A., CICEKLI, I., AKMAN, V. Turing test: 50 years later. Minds and Machines. 10 (4):463-518. 2000.

SEARLE, J. The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

SEARLE, J. Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1980. 3: 417–424.

SEARLE, J. What Your Computer Can’t Know. New York. Review of Books, October 9. 2014.

STERGIOU, K., LESSENICH. S. On impact factors and university rankings: from birth to boycott, In: Ethics in science and environmental politics. Vol. 13 pp6. 2013 P. 1-11. doi: 10.3354/esep00141.

TURING, A. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59. 1950. p. 433-460.

VAASEN, B. AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy. In: Philosophy & Technology. P. 35-88. doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00577-5.

VINGE, V. The coming technological singularity. Online. 1993.

WATANABE, M. From Biological to Artificial Consciousness, Neuroscientific Insights and Progress. Springer, 2022.

Relatórios.

AI4People. Ethical framework for a good society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Atomium – European Institute for Science, Media and Democracy. http://www.eismd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Ethical-Framework-for-a-Good AISociety.pdf. Acessado em abril de 2024.

BORI 2022: um ano de queda na produção científica para 23 países, inclusive o Brasil. 2022. Elsevier. Acessado em março 2024. https://abori.com.br/relatorios/2022-um-ano-de-queda-na-producao-cientifica-para-23-paises-inclusive-o-brasil. Consultado em agosto de 2024.

Future of Life Institute. Ansilomar AI Principles. https://futur eoflife.org/ai-principles/.2019. Acessado em Maio 2024.

https://ai4people.org. Acessado em Abril 2024.

Programas associados à ANPOF. https://www.anpof.org.br/anpof/programas-associados. Consultado em fevereiro 2024.

The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recognizes the need to improve the ways in which researchers and the outputs of scholarly research are evaluated. https://sfdora.org. Acessado abril 2024.

The Toronto declaration: Protecting the right to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems. https://www.torontodeclaration.org/. 2018. Acessado em maio 2024.