Cocreated medical decision making

A theoretical interaction between value cocreation and shared medical decision making

Authors

  • Jason Amorim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36517/2525-3468.ip.v5iespecial1.2020.43513.68-83

Keywords:

Patient Centered Care, Value cocreation, Shared Medical Decision Making, Cocreated Medical Decision Making

Abstract

The purpose of this theoretical interaction is what is now called Co-Created Medical Decision Making (TDMC), which will provide an understanding of which stakeholders, and which patients' preferences and activities influence decision making. As for advancing shared medical decision-making, TDMC proposes engaging new stakeholders such as other healthcare providers, patient friends, and other patients with the same illness, with a focus on creating patient value through co-creation. . TDMC also proposes patient engagement in pleasurable activity practices. The expected impact of developing the theory of CMDT is greater engagement of patients with various diseases in their own treatments, as well as the engagement of other stakeholders, as well as encouraging the practice of pleasurable patient activities. And, as a result, provide health and well-being to a significant portion of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jason Amorim

Doutorando em Administração na Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA).

References

ALDEN, Dana L. Decision aid influences on factors associated with patient empowerment prior to cancer treatment decision making. Medical Decision Making, v. 34, n. 7, p. 884-898, 2014.

ALDEN, Dana L. et al. Who decides: Me or we? Family involvement in medical decision making in Eastern and Western countries. Medical Decision Making, v. 38, n. 1, p. 14-25, 2017.

________. Culture and medical decision making: Healthcare consumer perspectives in Japan and the United States. Health Psychology, v. 34, n. 12, p. 1133, 2015.

ALDEN, Dana L.; FRIEND, John; CHUN, Maria BJ. Shared Decision Making and Patient Decision Aids: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Hawai ‘i Physicians. Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public Health, v. 72, n. 11, p. 396, 2013.

ANDERSON, Robert M.; FUNNELL, Martha M. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient education and counseling, v. 79, n. 3, p. 277-282, 2010.

BAKER, Michael J. SAREN, Michael . Marketing Theory - A student Text – 2nd edition. Sage, Ed E book. 2014.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Diretrizes para o cuidado das pessoas com doenças crônicas nas redes de atenção à saúde e nas linhas de cuidado prioritárias. Brasília-DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2013.

________. Ministério da Saúde. Doenças raras: o que são, causas, tratamento, diagnóstico e prevenção. Disponível em: http://portalms.saude.gov.br/saude-de-a-z/doencas-raras. Acesso em 10/04/2019.

CHEONG, Chin Yee et al. Creative music therapy in an acute care setting for older patients with delirium and dementia. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, v. 6, n. 2, p. 268-275, 2016.

COHEN, Mirian Miranda; DA SILVA, Chayana Leocádio; JORGE, Marcelino José. Cocriação em saúde: Um levantamento sistemático da literatura. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, v. 12, n. 3, p. 79-91, 2018.

FRIEND, John; ALDEN, Dana. Preference for Family Involvement in Treatment Decision Making Among Japanese Consumers: An Examination of Value-Focused Predictors. In 40th Annual North American Meeting of Society Medical Decision Making. 40., 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada.

FRIEDENREICH, Christine M. et al. Physical activity and cancer outcomes: a precision medicine approach. Clinical Cancer Research, v. 22, n. 19, p. 4766-4775, 2016.

FROSSARD, Vera Cecília; DIAS, Maria Clara Marques. O impacto da internet na interação entre pacientes: novos cenários em saúde. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, n. ahead, 2016.

GRÖNROOS, Christian. Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing theory, v. 11, n. 3, p. 279-301, 2011.

HO, Rainbow TH; LO, Phyllis HY; LUK, Mai Yee. A good time to dance? A mixed-methods approach of the effects of dance movement therapy for breast cancer patients during and after radiotherapy. Cancer nursing, v. 39, n. 1, p. 32-41, 2016.

IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; FIOCRUZ - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013 - Percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas. Rio de Janeiro, 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.pns.icict.fiocruz.br/>. Acessado em 20/04/2019.


JOHNSON, Bev et al. Partnering with patients and families to design a patient-and family-centered health care system. Institute for Patient-and Family-Centered Care and Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2008.

KOSTELI, Maria-Christina et al. Barriers and enablers of physical activity engagement for patients with COPD in primary care. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, v. 12, p. 1019, 2017.

KOTLER, Philip; KARTAJAYA, Hermawan; SETIAWAN, Iwan. Marketing 3.0: as forças que estão definindo o novo marketing centrado no ser humano. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010.

__________. Marketing 4.0: Do tradicional ao digital. Rio de Janeiro: Sextante, 2017.

LAIDSAAR-POWELL, Rebekah C. et al. Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient education and counseling, v. 91, n. 1, p. 3-13, 2013.

LÉGARÉ, France et al. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model. Journal of interprofessional care, v. 25, n. 1, p. 18-25, 2011.

MCCOLL-KENNEDY, Janet R. et al. Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of Service Research, v. 15, n. 4, p. 370-389, 2012.

MCQUOID, Julia. Finding joy in poor health: The leisure-scapes of chronic illness. Social Science & Medicine, v. 183, p. 88-96, 2017.

ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA SAÚDE (OMS). Cuidados inovadores para condições crônicas: componentes estruturais de ação. Brasília, 2003.

PRAHALAD, C. K.; RAMASWAMY, V. The co-creation connection. Strategy and Business, p. 50-61, 2002.

__________. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. 2004.

RAMASWAMY, Venkat. Co-creating development. Development Outreach, v. 13, n. 2, p. 38-43, 2011.

RAMASWAMY, Venkat; OZCAN, Kerincam. O paradigma da cocriação. 1. Ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.

SAGAZ, Sidimar Meira et al. Abordagens e usos atuais do marketing em organizações de saúde: aproximações com a teoria do cuidado humano. Revista Visão: Gestão Organizacional, v. 6, n. 2, 2017.

STIGGELBOUT, Anne M.; PIETERSE, Arwen H.; DE HAES, Johanna CJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient education and counseling, v. 98, n. 10, p. 1172-1179, 2015.
TADDEO, Patrícia da Silva et al. Acesso, prática educativa e empoderamento de pacientes com doenças crônicas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 17, n. 11, 2012.

VEATCH, Robert M. Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age. What physician-patient roles foster the most ethical relationship?. Hastings Center Report, p. 5-7, 1972.

WASCHKI, Benjamin et al. Disease progression and changes in physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, v. 192, n. 3, p. 295-306, 2015.

Published

2020-03-01

How to Cite

AMORIM, Jason. Cocreated medical decision making: A theoretical interaction between value cocreation and shared medical decision making. Informação em Pauta, [S. l.], v. 5, n. especial, p. 68–83, 2020. DOI: 10.36517/2525-3468.ip.v5iespecial1.2020.43513.68-83. Disponível em: http://periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/43513. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.