I DIRITTI DEL SOSPETTATO NEL TRIBUNALE PENALE INTERNAZIONALE PER L'EX JUGOSLAVIA
Keywords:
Tribunal Penal Internacional para a ex-Iugoslávia, Suspeito, Processo JustoAbstract
Neste artigo propomos discutir alguns problemas que surgem em relação à tutela do direito do suspeito no Tribunal Penal Internacional para a ex-Jugoslávia. É nossa opinião que, ainda que certos direitos são garantidos no complexo Estatuto, a norma processual e a jurisprudência do Tribunal tem falhado na sua tarefa de garantir um processo justo ao suspeito.References
CRYER, Robert. Prosecuting International Crimes. Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
DE FRANCIA, Cristian. Due process in International Criminal Courts: Why Procedure Matters. Virginia Law Review, vol. 87, no. 7, nov. 2001.
DEL PONTE, Carla. Investigation and Prosecution of large scale crimes at the International Level. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2006.
DITORE, Koha. Tribunals Indictment are based on Evidence, 3 December 2004, available on www.un.org/icty , last consulted on 25/07/07.
DIXON, David. Safeguarding the Rights of Suspects in Police Custody. Policing and Society, vol. 1, 1990.
EPSTEIN, Richard Allen. What do we mean by the Rule of Law. Wellington: New Zealand Business Roundtable, 2005.
FERNANDEZ ESTEBAN, Maria Luisa. The Rule of Law in the European Constitution. London: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
HARRIS, David. The Right to a Fair Trail in Criminal Proceedings as a Human Right. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 2, 1967.
HUDGSON, Jaqueline. Adding Injury to Injustice: The Suspect at the police Station. Journal of Law and Society, 1994
_____. The Police, the Prosecutor and the Judge d’Instruction. British Journal of Criminology, vol. 41, 2001.
_____. Suspects, Defendants and Victims in the French Criminal Process: The context of Recent Reforms. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 51, 2002.
HUNTER, Keith. Trial by Trickery. Aukland: Hunter Productions, 2006.
GRANDE, Elisabetta. The Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2000.
GUHR, Alexandra & MOSCHTAGHI, Ramin & AFSHAR, Rassekh. Max Planck Manual on Fair Trial Standards. Hamburg: Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Law, 2006.
FIELD, Steven. Judicial Supervision and the Pre Trial Process. Journal of Law and Society, vol 21, 1994.
LARSON, Arthur. Design for Research in International Rule of Law. Durham: World Rule of Law Centre, Book Series No. 2, School of Law, 1961.
LEIGH, Monroe. Witness Anonymity is inconsistent with Due Process. The American Journal of International Law. vol. 91, no. 1, jan, 1997.
LEO, Richard. Inside the Interrogation Room. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1996.
MARSHALL, Thomas Humphery. Citizenship and Social Class, In Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Oxford: R. E. Goodin & P. Pettit (eds), Blackwell, 1997.
MATHIAS, Don. The Accused’s Right to a Fair Trail: Absolute or Limitable? New Zealand Law Review, 2006.
McINTYRE, Gabrielle. Equality of Arms – Defining Human Rights in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Leiden Journal of International Law, no. 16, 2003.
PLOSCOWE, Morris. The Investigating Magistrate in European Criminal Procedure. Michigan Law Review, vol. 33, 1935.
SAUNDERS, Cheryl & LE ROY, Katherine. The Rule of Law. Sydney: The Federation Press, 2003.
SLOAN, James. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia abd Fair Trail Rights: A Closer Look. Leiden Journal of International Law. no. 9, 1996.
SPROKEN, Taru & ATTINGER, Marelle. Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Existing Level of Safeguards in the European Union. European Commission, dec. 2005.
STRAVOS, Stephanos. The Right to a Fair Trail in Emergency Situations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2., 1992.
_____. The Guarantees for Accused Persons Under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.
WALKER, Geoffrey. The Rule of Law. Foundation of Constitutional Democracy. Melbourne: University Press, 1988.
WHITE, Robin. Investigators and Prosecutors or, Desperately Seeking Scotland: Re- Formulation of the ‘Philips Principle’. The Modern Law Review, vol. 69, 2006.
ZAPPALÀ, Salvatore. Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à Revista NOMOS o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
- Autores são responsáveis pelo conteúdo constante no manuscrito publicado na revista.
