Nurses’ knowledge and practice toward computed tomography safety protocols




Knowledge; Patient Safety; Nurses; Diagnostic Imaging; Nursing Care.


Objective: to assess nurses’ knowledge and practice toward computed tomography scan safety guidelines. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of 131 nurses from two government hospitals. Self-designed questionnaire was used to assess nurses’ sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, and practice. Descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate characteristics, correlations were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and the Mann-Whitney U and the Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to compare the mean ranks of knowledge and practice scores. Results: most respondents were female (91.6%), were aged 20–29 years (57.3%), and had bachelor’s degrees (74%). Knowledge and practice levels were 58% and 78.9% respectively. A positive correlation between knowledge and practice was observed among nurses (r=0.684, p<0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge and practice scores. Conclusion: nurses showed adequate level of practice toward computed tomography scan safety preparations while their knowledge level was deficient. Contributions to practice: this study informs the importance of knowledge in guiding nursing practice toward appropriate computed tomography scan safety measures.


Donya M, Radford M, ElGuindy A, Firmin D, Yacoub M. Radiation in medicine: origins, risks and aspirations. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2014;2014(4):437-48. doi:

European Society of R, European Federation of Radiographer S. Patient safety in medical imaging: a joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):45. doi:

Rogers DC, Tadi P. Intravenous contrast. In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2021 [cited Jan 25, 2022]. Available from:

Moyo M. Radiology nursing: a growing specialty. Am Nurse Today [Internet]. 2019 [cited Jan 25, 2022];14(9):72-5. Available from:

Nettina SM, Msn A-B, Nettina SM. Lippincott manual of nursing practice 11th Edition. Philadelphia. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.

Carley A, Melrose S, Rempel G, Diehl-Jones W, Schwarz BA. Professional development needs of non-radiology nurses: an exploration of nurses’ experiences caring for interventional radiology patients. J Radiol Nurs. 2021;40(2):146-51. doi:

Thambura MJ, Vinette CI. Nurses’ knowledge of ionizing radiation in northern gauteng state hospitals in South Africa. J Radiol Nurs. 2019;38(1):56-60. doi:

Alzubaidi MA, Mutairi HH, Alakel SM, Al Abdullah HAS, Albakri IA, Alqahtani SFA. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of nurses towards ionizing radiation during radiography in Jeddah City, 2017. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2017;69(7):2906-9. doi:

Hirvonen L, Schroderus-Salo T, Henner A, Ahonen S, Kääriäinen M, Miettunen J, et al. Nurses’ knowledge of radiation protection: a cross-sectional study. Radiography (Lond). 2019;25(4):e108-e112. doi:

Kim IH, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. Review of cone beam computed tomography guidelines in North America. Quintessence Int. 2019; 50(2):136-45. doi:

Nijssen EC, Nelemans PJ, Rennenberg RJ, Van Ommen V, Wildberger JE. Evaluation of safety guidelines on the use of iodinated contrast material: conundrum continued. Investigative radiology. Invest Radiol. 2018; 53(10):616-22. doi:

Rahimi AM, Nurdin I, Ismail S, Khalil A. Malaysian nurses’ knowledge of radiation protection: a cross-sectional study. Radiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:5566654. doi:

Alghamdi A, Alghamdi M, Alamri S, Alshehri M, Alatawi I, Alzahran S, et al. Assessment of Saudi Arabian nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward magnetic resonance imaging safety. J Radiol Nurs. 2021;40(2):187-93. doi:

Carvalho EC, Eduardo AH, Romanzini A, Simão TP, Zamarioli CM, Garbuio DC, Herdman TH. Correspondence between NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses and Outcomes as Proposed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(1):66-78. doi:

Sánchez-Borges M, Aberer W, Brockow K, Celik GE, Cernadas J, Greenberger PA, et al. Controversies in drug allergy: radiographic contrast media. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):61-5. doi:

Andreucci M, Faga T, Serra R, Sarro G, Michael A. Update on the renal toxicity of iodinated contrast drugs used in clinical medicine. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017;9:25-37. doi:

Sawhney S, Wilson SR. Can ultrasound with contrast enhancement replace nonenhanced computed tomography scans in patients with contraindication to computed tomography contrast agents?. Ultrasound Qy. 2017;33(2):125-32. doi:

Zimmermann A, Flis A, Gaworska–Krzemińska A, Cohen MN. Drug-safety reporting in Polish nursing practice—Cross sectional surveys. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0241377. doi:

Rühm W, Cool D, Clement C. Radiological protection revisited—the story continues. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2021;60(4):507-10. doi:



How to Cite

Algamdi, M., Alghamdi, A. ., Dauod, K. ., Alatawi, K. ., Alrawaili, M., Alhwiti, M. ., & Albalawi, A. . (2022). Nurses’ knowledge and practice toward computed tomography safety protocols. Rev Rene, 23, e77891.



Research Article