Adaptação transcultural e validade de conteúdo da Escala de Autoeficacia en Reanimación Cardiopulmonar versão brasileira
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/2175-6783.20262796898Palavras-chave:
Autoeficácia; Parada Cardíaca; Inquéritos e Questionários; Reanimação Cardiopulmonar; Enfermagem.Resumo
Objetivo: estimar as evidências de validade do conteúdo da Escala de Autoeficacia en Reanimación Cardiopulmonar Básica y Avanzada traduzida e adaptada transculturalmente para versão brasileira. Métodos: estudo metodológico de adaptação transcultural e validação de conteúdo da Escala de Autoeficacia en Reanimación Cardiopulmonar Básica y Avanzada para o contexto brasileiro. A clareza foi avaliada por 40 adolescentes (subescala de Suporte Básico de Vida) e 40 profissionais de saúde (subescala de Suporte Avançado de Vida), considerando-se adequados itens com concordância ≥ 80%. A validade de conteúdo foi avaliada por 10 especialistas em urgência e emergência, por meio do Índice de Validade de Conteúdo, adotando-se valores ≥ 0,78 para os itens e ≥ 0,90 para a escala global. Resultados: os itens apresentaram índice de validade de conteúdo ≥ 0,80. Os índices globais de validade de conteúdo foram de 0,94 para clareza e 0,96 para relevância, demonstrando excelentes evidências de validade de conteúdo. Conclusão: a versão brasileira da Escala de Autoeficacia en Reanimación Cardiopulmonar Básica y Avanzada apresentou evidências de validade de conteúdo satisfatórias. Contribuições para a prática: disponibiliza instrumento com potencial para subsidiar estratégias educativas em reanimação cardiopulmonar e ampliar pesquisas e ações de educação em saúde com adolescentes.
Downloads
Referências
1. Carvalho CG, Martins CCG, Silva IC, Fernandes RM, Dantas JR, Oliveira-Kumakura AR, et al. Simulated clinical scenario of basic life support for adults in a hospital context: an integrative review. Rev Rene. 2025;26:e94226. doi: https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20252694226
2. Hernando ASSC, Nieves-Alonso JM, Mjertan A, Martínez DG, Roca AP. In-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, prognostic factors and results. Med Clin (Barc). 2023;70(7):373-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2022.06.006
3. Pelek CA, Silva-Junior MF, Muller EVN. Level of knowledge about basic life support of undergraduate students from the health area. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2021;45(2):e078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v45.2-20200516
4. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing [Internet]. 2006 [cited Apr 30, 2026];307-37. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Timo-Lorenz-3/post/Can-we-use-general-self-efficacy-scale-GSE-10-for-measuring-the-self-efficacy-in-every-case/attachment/59d62592c49f478072e9a60c/AS:272165419585544@1441900700706/download/BanduraGuide2006.pdf
5. Cardós-Alonso MC, Inzunza M, Gyllencreutz L, Espinosa S, Vázquez T, Fernandez MA, et al. Use of self-efficacy scale in mass casualty incidents during drill exercises. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):745. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11175-w
6. Verón SEB, Palacios JVO, Filártiga EAO. Conocimiento sobre reanimación cardiopulmonar del personal de enfermería. Rev Cient Cienc Salud. 2024;6:e6129. doi: https://doi.org/10.53732/rccsalud/2024.e6129
7. Ko JS, Kim SR, Cho BJ. The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education on knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and confidence in performing CPR among elementary school students in Korea. Healthcare. 2023;11(14):2047. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142047
8. Ribeiro AJS, Bittencourt MN, Campos DS, Santos Junior DF, Moraes MS, Souza ARL, et al. Content validity evidence of a digital educational technology for alcohol use prevention. Rev Rene. 2025; 26:e95523. doi: https://doi.org/10.36517/2175-6783.20252695523
9. Pascual SN, Blanco-Blanco A, Puente JCT. Autoeficacia en reanimación cardiopulmonar (RCP) básica y avanzada: diseño y validación de una escala. Educ Med. 2018;19(6):350-6. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.05.002
10. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation, and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-74. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
11. Vinuto J. A amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temáticas. 2014;22(44):203-20. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20396/tematicas.v22i44.10977
12. Abo-Rass F, Nakash O, Abu-Kaf S, Gelaye B, Abojabel H, Khatib A. Validation of the Arabic version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) in three Arab samples. PLoS One. 2025;20(11):e0335126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335126
13. Costa NFCG, Mendes SRO, Frazão CMFQ, Moraes KL, Sousa CN, Leal LP, et al. Adaptation and validation of the kidney transplant understanding tool for the Brazilian context. Acta Paul Enferm. 2023;36:eAPE01082. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023AO010822
14. Alshammari S, Alshwieer MAM, Dammas SS, Alrasheed AM, Alasmari MA, Alahmari MMA, et al. Arabic translation, cross cultural adaptation, and validation of Foot Health Status Questionnaire among Saudi individuals with plantar fasciitis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):754. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04202-9
15. Anantapong K, Jiraphan A, Pariwatcharakul P, Buathong N, Setthawatcharawanich S, Aunjitsakul W, et al. Psychometric validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the dementia knowledge assessment Scale-Thai (DKAS-Thai). BMC Geriatr. 2026;26(1):219. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06935-0
16. Kaminski J, Pizzera A, Schobersberger W, Blank C, Wolfarth B, Bendau A, et al. German translation and validation of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool 1 (SMHAT-1) and Sport Mental Health Recognition Tool 1 (SMHRT-1). Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/174795412614432
17. Bispo KTC, Perdigão AG, Bahmad Jr F. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of an instrument - practical guide. Brasília Med. 2022;59:1-5. doi: http://doi.org/10.5935/2236-5117.2022v59a293
18. Ciofi-Silva CL, Cordeiro L, Oliveira NA, Mainardi GM, Levin AS, Almeida RMA, et al. Workload assessment: cross-cultural adaptation, content validity and instrument reliability. Rev Bras Enferm. 2023;76(3):e20220556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0556
19. Ursin J, Hyytinen H, Silvennoinen K, Toom A. Linguistic, contextual, and experiential equivalence issues in the adaptation of a performance-based assessment of generic skills in higher education. Front Educ. 2022;7:885825. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.885825
20. Gea AIP, Pastor FJS. The cultural element in the adaptation of a test: proposals and reflections on internal and external influences. Educ Sci. 2022;12(5):291. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050291
21. Albuquerque T, Resende HG, Keulen GEV, Damasceno VO. Revisão dos principais guidelines publicados de validação transcultural para a tradução, adaptação e validação de questionários. Rev UNIFA. 2025;38:1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.22480/rev.unifa.2025.38.811
22. Pontrelli Mecca T, Tafla TL, Bueno FMB, Valentini F, Bassetto SA, Teixeira MCTV. Transcultural adaptation of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-3). Int J Dev Disabil. 2022;70(4):684-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2137953
23. Sá CSC, Luz C, Rodrigues LP, Cordovil R. Motor competence assessment – adaptação cultural para o Brasil (MCA-BR). Fisioter Pesqui. 2021;28(1):49-59. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/20017628012021
24. Cruchinho P, López-Franco MD, Capelas ML, Almeida S, Bennett PM, Silva MM, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of measurement instruments: a practical guideline for novice researchers. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025;17:2701-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S419714
25. Abulela MAA, Khalaf MA. Does the number of response categories impact validity evidence in self-report measures? A scoping review. SAGE Open. 2024;14(1):1-16. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440241230363
26. Mokkink LB, Herbelet S, Tuinman PR, Terwee CB. Content validity: judging the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of an outcome measurement instrument: a COSMIN perspective. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025;185:111879. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111879
27. Boné MA, Loureiro MJ, Bonito J. Quality learning in basic life support in Portuguese basic education school: a cross-sectional study with 10th grade students. Societies. 2023;13(6):147. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13060147
28. Ramesh A, Ganesh R, Krishnamoorthy S, Maheshwari P, Ramanathan R. Teaching hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills to adolescents: effectiveness of a structured training program. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;45(1):2325. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_685_21
29. Sihvo M, Heilala V, Kärkkäinen T. First aid self-efficacy: a scale adaptation and psychometric properties. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22486-w
30. Petrič G, Atanasova S. Validation of the extended e-health literacy scale: structural validity, construct validity and measurement invariance. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19431-8
Downloads
Publicado
Declaração de Disponibilidade de Dados
Os autores declaram que os dados utilizados e/ou analisados durante o presente estudo estão disponíveis mediante solicitação razoável ao autor correspondente.
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Antonio Wellington Vieira Mendes, Marília de Oliveira Crispim , Adenilson da Silva Gomes, Nelson Miguel Galindo Neto, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli, Rita de Cassia Gengo Silva e Butcher, Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz Frazão
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Como Citar
