Sweet taste sensitivity among pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36517/2175-6783.20262796084

Palabras clave:

Taste Threshold; Pregnancy; Taste Disorders.

Resumen

Objective: to investigate sweet taste detection thresholds in pregnant women at different gestational periods. Methods: this cross-sectional, analytical and epidemiological study was conducted at Family Health Units. We included 109 pregnant women aged 18 years or older, in any trimester of pregnancy. The sweet taste detection threshold was assessed in a whole-mouth taste test. Participants also completed a structured questionnaire on personal, demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics, and their weight and height were measured. Results: the average threshold values studied were 2.83 g/L in the first and second trimesters and 1.41 g/L in the third trimester, remaining stable across gestational periods. Sweet taste detection thresholds differed according to household arrangement: pregnant women living alone or with friends had a significantly higher threshold index, indicating lower sweet taste sensitivity. Conclusion: the sweet taste detection threshold remained stable throughout pregnancy, and household arrangement may influence sweet taste sensitivity. Contributions to practice: identifying altered sweet taste sensitivity throughout pregnancy can inform interventions to promote healthy eating behaviors.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

1. Bremenkamp ME, Wagemacher M, Vasconcelos CM. Percepção sensorial do gosto doce e sua relação com a preferência e o estado nutricional de adolescentes e adultos. Sci Nat [Internet]. 2025 [cited Sept 2, 2025];7(1):148-60. Available from: https://periodicos.ufac.br/index.php/SciNat/article/view/7778

2. Van den Brink M, IJpma I, Tissing WJE, Havermans RC. Taste dysfunction in children-a clinical perspective and review of assessment methods. Chem Senses. 2021;46:bjab035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjab035

3. Malo-Vintimilla L, Aguirre C, Vergara A, Fernández-Verdejo R, Galgani JE. Resting energy metabolism and sweet taste preference during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. Br J Nutr. 2024;131(3):384-90. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001927

4. Yunker AG, Chakravartti SP, Kullmann S, Veit R, Angelo B, Jann K, et al. Sweet taste preference is associated with greater hypothalamic response to glucose and longitudinal weight gain. Physiol Behav. 2023;270:114292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114292

5. Ha JG, Kim B ra, Cho A, Jeong Y, Rha MS, Kang JW, et al. Visualization of the relationship between electrogustometry and whole mouth test using multidimensional scaling. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8798. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35372-5

6. Tan SY, Hack C, Yu C, Rennick I, Ohanian J, Dezan M, et al. Alterations in sweet taste function in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and potential implications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(16):2613-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.2015282

7. Catamo E, Tornese G, Concas MP, Gasparini P, Robino A. Differences in taste and smell perception between type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and healthy controls. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(1):193-200. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2020.08.025

8. Mikhail C, Elgaaly K, El Hamid AA El Latif A, Shaker O, Ali S. Gustatory dysfunction among a sample of depressed Egyptian adults under antidepressants therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5543840. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5543840

9. Goldschlager J, Cintron C, Hall R, Shields T, Tolbert GL, Woldebirhan R, et al. Taste processing in autism spectrum disorder: a translational scoping review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025;170:106031. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106031

10. Geurdes J. Hormonal and sensory changes during pregnancy. Maternal and Pediatric Nutrition [Internet]. 2022 [cited Sept 2, 2025];7(2):101. Available from: https://www.longdom.org/

11. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.

12. Ogle DH, Doll JC, Wheeler AP, Dinno A. FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis. R package version 0.9.6 [Internet]. 2024 [cited Sept 7, 2025]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FSA

13. Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4 [Internet]. 2024 [cited Sept 7, 2025]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

14. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.

15. Brazil JM, Ribeiro IJ, Lima ER, Milagres MP, Matos TB, Duarte AC. Influence of alcohol consumption on the taste perception of sweet and salty tastes in college students. Rev Eletr Saude Ment Alcool Drog. 2022;18(2):96-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1806-6976.smad.2022.184336

16. Muluh EAE, McCormack JC, Mo Y, Garratt M, Peng M. Gustatory and olfactory shifts during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiol Behav. 2024; 273:114388. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114388

17. Souza RR, Costa DF, Kodama FBO, Pereira MG, Nascimento FRB, Silva IFP, et al. Fatores de risco e estratégias de prevenção na diabetes gestacional. J Med Biosci Res. 2025;2(1):464-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.70164/jmbr.v2i1.489

18. Tansaraviput S, Nolden AA. Sucrose, NaCl, and citric acid suppress the metallic sensation of FeSO4. Chem Senses. 2024;49:bjad052. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad052

19. Dequae CGR, Raber-Durlacher JE, Epstein JB, Vries R, Laheij AMGA. Taste alterations after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32:687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08900-w

20. Zhu S, Zhao A, Lan H, Li P, Mao S, Szeto IMY, et al. Nausea and vomiting during early pregnancy among Chinese women and its association with nutritional intakes. Nutrients. 2023;15(4):933. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040933

21. Tan PC, Kartik B, Thanendran P, Zakaria R, Win ST, Omar SZ. Taste, smell and food-related nausea and vomiting responses in hyperemesis gravidarum: a case-controlled study. Sci Rep. 2020;10:4445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61114-y

22. Czarniecka-Skubina E, Gutkowska K, Hamulka J. The family environment as a source for creating the dietary attitudes of primary school students—a focus group interview: the junior-edu-Żywienie (JEŻ) project. Nutrients. 2023;15(23):4930. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234930

23. Holgerson PL, Hasslöf P, Esberg A, Haworth S, Domellöf M, West CE, et al. Genetic preference for sweet taste in mothers associates with mother-child preference and intake. Nutrients. 2023;15(11):2565. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112565

Publicado

2026-01-12

Declaración de disponibilidad de datos

The authors state that all data are fully available in this article.

Número

Sección

Artigos de Pesquisa

Cómo citar

1.
Matos TB, Cunha SS, Ferreira CGS, Brazil JM, Braga JM dos S, Faria LA de, et al. Sweet taste sensitivity among pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy. Rev Rene [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 12 [cited 2026 Feb. 25];27:e96084. Available from: https://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/96084

Datos de los fondos