Sweet taste sensitivity among pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy

Talita Batista Matos; Sheila Silva Cunha; Christini Gomes Senhorinho Ferreira; Jamille Marinho Brazil; Jociéli Moura dos Santos Braga; Luciana Amaral de Faria; Maria Patrícia Milagres

doi:10.36517/2175-6783.20262796084

Autores

Talita Batista Matos Southwest Bahia State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-5826
Sheila Silva Cunha Southwest Bahia State University https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8172-4730
Christini Gomes Senhorinho Ferreira Southwest Bahia State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-6380
Jamille Marinho Brazil Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8391-4056
Jociéli Moura dos Santos Braga Southwest Bahia State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-8908
Luciana Amaral de Faria Southwest Bahia State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-9181
Maria Patrícia Milagres Southwest Bahia State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-5624

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36517/2175-6783.20262796084

Palavras-chave:

Limiar Gustativo; Gravidez; Distúrbios do Paladar.

Resumo

Objetivo: investigar o limiar de detecção ao gosto doce em gestantes em diferentes períodos gestacionais. Métodos: estudo epidemiológico, analítico e transversal, realizado em Unidades de Saúde da Família. Participaram 109 gestantes com idade acima de 18 anos, em qualquer trimestre gestacional. O limiar gustativo ao gosto doce foi avaliado por meio de um teste de análise sensorial do tipo estímulo da boca toda. As participantes também responderam a um questionário estruturado com informações pessoais, demográficas, socioeconômicas e de saúde, além de terem peso e altura aferidos. Resultados: as médias do limiar estudado foram de 2,83 g/L no primeiro e segundo trimestres, e 1,41 g/L no terceiro trimestre, mantendo-se estável entre os períodos gestacionais. Observou-se diferença no limiar de detecção em função do arranjo familiar, gestantes que residiam sozinhas ou com amigos apresentaram um aumento significativo no índice limiar, indicando menor sensibilidade ao gosto doce. Conclusão: observou-se que o limiar de detecção ao gosto doce se manteve estável ao longo da gestação e o tipo de arranjo familiar pode influenciar a sensibilidade ao gosto doce. Contribuições para a prática: identificar alterações na sensibilidade gustativa ao gosto doce ao longo da gestação pode subsidiar intervenções voltadas à promoção de comportamentos alimentares saudáveis.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

1. Bremenkamp ME, Wagemacher M, Vasconcelos CM. Percepção sensorial do gosto doce e sua relação com a preferência e o estado nutricional de adolescentes e adultos. Sci Nat [Internet]. 2025 [cited Sept 2, 2025];7(1):148-60. Available from: https://periodicos.ufac.br/index.php/SciNat/article/view/7778

2. Van den Brink M, IJpma I, Tissing WJE, Havermans RC. Taste dysfunction in children-a clinical perspective and review of assessment methods. Chem Senses. 2021;46:bjab035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjab035

3. Malo-Vintimilla L, Aguirre C, Vergara A, Fernández-Verdejo R, Galgani JE. Resting energy metabolism and sweet taste preference during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. Br J Nutr. 2024;131(3):384-90. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114523001927

4. Yunker AG, Chakravartti SP, Kullmann S, Veit R, Angelo B, Jann K, et al. Sweet taste preference is associated with greater hypothalamic response to glucose and longitudinal weight gain. Physiol Behav. 2023;270:114292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114292

5. Ha JG, Kim B ra, Cho A, Jeong Y, Rha MS, Kang JW, et al. Visualization of the relationship between electrogustometry and whole mouth test using multidimensional scaling. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8798. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35372-5

6. Tan SY, Hack C, Yu C, Rennick I, Ohanian J, Dezan M, et al. Alterations in sweet taste function in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and potential implications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(16):2613-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.2015282

7. Catamo E, Tornese G, Concas MP, Gasparini P, Robino A. Differences in taste and smell perception between type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and healthy controls. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(1):193-200. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2020.08.025

8. Mikhail C, Elgaaly K, El Hamid AA El Latif A, Shaker O, Ali S. Gustatory dysfunction among a sample of depressed Egyptian adults under antidepressants therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:5543840. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5543840

9. Goldschlager J, Cintron C, Hall R, Shields T, Tolbert GL, Woldebirhan R, et al. Taste processing in autism spectrum disorder: a translational scoping review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025;170:106031. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106031

10. Geurdes J. Hormonal and sensory changes during pregnancy. Maternal and Pediatric Nutrition [Internet]. 2022 [cited Sept 2, 2025];7(2):101. Available from: https://www.longdom.org/

11. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.

12. Ogle DH, Doll JC, Wheeler AP, Dinno A. FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis. R package version 0.9.6 [Internet]. 2024 [cited Sept 7, 2025]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FSA

13. Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4 [Internet]. 2024 [cited Sept 7, 2025]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

14. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.

15. Brazil JM, Ribeiro IJ, Lima ER, Milagres MP, Matos TB, Duarte AC. Influence of alcohol consumption on the taste perception of sweet and salty tastes in college students. Rev Eletr Saude Ment Alcool Drog. 2022;18(2):96-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1806-6976.smad.2022.184336

16. Muluh EAE, McCormack JC, Mo Y, Garratt M, Peng M. Gustatory and olfactory shifts during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiol Behav. 2024; 273:114388. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114388

17. Souza RR, Costa DF, Kodama FBO, Pereira MG, Nascimento FRB, Silva IFP, et al. Fatores de risco e estratégias de prevenção na diabetes gestacional. J Med Biosci Res. 2025;2(1):464-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.70164/jmbr.v2i1.489

18. Tansaraviput S, Nolden AA. Sucrose, NaCl, and citric acid suppress the metallic sensation of FeSO4. Chem Senses. 2024;49:bjad052. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad052

19. Dequae CGR, Raber-Durlacher JE, Epstein JB, Vries R, Laheij AMGA. Taste alterations after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32:687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08900-w

20. Zhu S, Zhao A, Lan H, Li P, Mao S, Szeto IMY, et al. Nausea and vomiting during early pregnancy among Chinese women and its association with nutritional intakes. Nutrients. 2023;15(4):933. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040933

21. Tan PC, Kartik B, Thanendran P, Zakaria R, Win ST, Omar SZ. Taste, smell and food-related nausea and vomiting responses in hyperemesis gravidarum: a case-controlled study. Sci Rep. 2020;10:4445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61114-y

22. Czarniecka-Skubina E, Gutkowska K, Hamulka J. The family environment as a source for creating the dietary attitudes of primary school students—a focus group interview: the junior-edu-Żywienie (JEŻ) project. Nutrients. 2023;15(23):4930. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234930

23. Holgerson PL, Hasslöf P, Esberg A, Haworth S, Domellöf M, West CE, et al. Genetic preference for sweet taste in mothers associates with mother-child preference and intake. Nutrients. 2023;15(11):2565. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112565