Doxastic tension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/Argumentos.27.10Keywords:
Logical coherence. Semantic information. Measure. Sophisticated reasoning.Abstract
Baggini and Stangroom (2006) informally introduce the notion of tension in the system of beliefs of a person. I propose a formalization of this notion in the Classical Sentential Logic; it results in measuring the tension of a set of sentences. This formalization uses the notion of semantic information.
References
BAGGINI, J.; STANGROOM, J. Do You Think What You Think You Think? The Ultimate Philosophical Handbook. London: Plume, 2006.
BAGGINI, J.; STANGROOM, J. Você pensa o que acha que pensa? Um check-up filosófico. Trad. Roberto Valente. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2010.
COSTA, C. Uma introdução contemporânea à filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
FINE, K. Normal forms in modal logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, v. XVI, n. 2, p. 229-237, 1975.
HINTIKKA, J. Distributive Normal Forms in First-Order Logic. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, v. 40, p. 48-91, 1965.
LINDEMANN, J. L.; SAUTTER, F. T. A abordagem carroliana a paradoxos. Pensando Revista de Filosofia, v. 10, n. 20, p. 91-106, 2019.
SAUTTER, F. T. A dinâmica da argumentação sob uma perspectiva lógica. Dissertatio. Pelotas, v. 35, p. 195-207, 2012.
SAUTTER, F. T. Informação: mundos possíveis e seus duais. Veritas. Porto Alegre, v. 65, n. 3, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.
The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion
1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.