Tensions and convergences between Deliberative Democracy and Radical Democracy: synergistic propositions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/10.36517/Argumentos.30.10Keywords:
Deliberative Democracy. Radical Democracy. Citizenship.Abstract
The objective of this work is to critically evaluate how the theoretical foundations of Radical Democracy, namely those exposed by Chantal Mouffe and her interlocutors, can contribute to the deepening of Deliberative Democracy with a Habermasian accent and its foundations of political participation. The problem that we intend to highlight concerns the possibility of equalizing the convergences and divergences between the fundamentals of Radical Democracy and Deliberative Democracy, aiming to constitute the improvement of contemporary political participation. In light of these problems, our hypothesis is that certain contributions of Radical Democracy are adequate with Deliberative Democracy; however, others do not, and on these we intend to identify support insufficiencies.
References
ALLAN, James; SCRUGGS, Lyle. Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, n. 48, p. 493-512, 2004.
ARENDT, Hannah. The crises in culture. In: Between past and future: six exercises in political thought. New York: Meridian, 1961.
AUCOIN, James L. The evolution of American investigative journalism. Missouri: University of Missouri Press, 2015.
BENHABIB, Seyla. Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy. Constellations, Cambridge, v. l, n. l, 1994.
BLUMENBERG, Hans. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Tecnology, 1983.
COHEN, Joshua. Liberty, Equality, Democracy. Cambridge: MIT, 2016.
COHEN, Joshua. Rousseau: a free community of equals. New York: Oxford, 2010.
CONNOLLY, William E. Democracy and Pluralism: the political thought. New York: Routledge, 2018.
CONNOLLY, William E. Identity/Difference: democratic negotiations of political paradox. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.
DAHL, Robert A. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
DAHL, Robert A. Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: autonomy vs. control. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
DASGUPTA, Partha; MASKIN, Eric. Democracy and the other goods. In: SHAPIRO, Ian; HACKERCORDON, Casiano (Eds.). Rethinking Democracy for a New Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
DOWNS, Anthony. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1957.
ELSTER, Jon; SLAGSTAND, Rune. Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
GALSTON, William A. Liberal Pluralism: the implications of value pluralism for political theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade. Vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. La soberanía popular como procedimiento: un concepto normativo de lo público. In: Jürgen Habermas: moralidad, ética y política. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1993.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus, 2000.
HARRIS, Neal; ACAROGLU, Onur. Thinking beyond neoliberalism: theorizing the future in the present. In: HARRIS, Neal; ACAROGLU, Onur. Thinking beyond neoliberalism: alternative societies, transition and resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
HAYEK, Friedrich A. The Road to Serfdom. New York: Routledge, 2001.
HONIG, Bonnie. Democracy and the foreigner. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
HONIG, Bonnie. Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.
HONOHAN, Iseult. Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge, 2000.
KELSEN, Hans. The essence and value of Democracy. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2019.
KENNEDY, Duncan. A critique to adjdudication. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.
KLARE, Karl. Legal theory and democratic reconstruction: reflections on 1989. In: ALEXANDER, Gregory S.; SKAPSKA, Grazyna (Eds.). A Fourth Way? Privatization, property and the emergence of new market economies. New York: Routledge, 2020.
KLAUSEN, Jimmy Casas; CHAMON, Paulo. Neoliberalism out of place: the rise of Brazilian ultraliberalism. In: SLOBODIAN, Quinn; PLEHWE, Dieter. (Org.). Market Civilizations: Neoliberals East and South. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2022.
LEAL, Rogério Gesta. Déficits democráticos na sociedade de riscos e (des)caminhos dos protagonismos institucionais no Brasil. São Paulo: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020.
LEAL, Rogério Gesta. Estado, Administração Pública e Sociedade – novos paradigmas. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2006.
LEAL, Rogério Gesta. Teoria do Estado: cidadania e política na modernidade. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2000.
LEFORT, Claude. Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
LEFORT, Claude. The political forms of modern society. Oxford: Polity Press, 1986.
LITOWITZ, Douglas E. Postmodern Philosophy and Law. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2020.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. After Virtue – a study in moral theory. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2007.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1988.
MOUFFE, Chantal. Hegemony, radical democracy and the political. New York: Routledge, 2013.
MOUFFE, Chantal. La paradoja democrática: el peligro del consenso en la politica contemporánea. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2000.
MOUFFE, Chantal. Por un modelo agonístico de la democracia. In: MOUFFE, Chantal. La Paradoja Democrática. Madrid: Gedisa, 2001.
MOUFFE, Chantal. Rawls: political philosophy without politics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, London, v. 13, n. 2, 1987.
OAKESHOTT, Michael. Conservadorismo. Belo Horizonte: Editora Âyiné, 2016.
OAKESHOTT, Michael. Morality and politics in Modern Europe. London: Yale University Press, 1993.
PARSONS, Talcott. Theories of Society: foundations of modern sociological theory. New York: The free press of glencoe Inc., 1961.
PARSONS, Talcott. The Social System. London: Toutledge, 1951.
POPPER, Karl. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1971.
RAWLS, John. Justiça como Equidade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
RAWLS, John. Liberalismo Político. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.
RAWLS, John. The law of peoples: the idea of public reason revisited. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2001.
ROEMER, John E. Does democracy engender justice? Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, nº 1281R. New Haven, Connecticut, sep./2001.
ROEMER, John E. Equality of opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
RORTHY, Richard. Liberalismo burgués posdmoderno. In: RORTY, Richard. Objetividad, relativismo y verdade. Barcelona: Paidós, 1996.
SANDEL, Michael. Democracy’s Discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
SANDEL, Michael. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
SANDEL, Michael. Public Philosophy: essays on morality in politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.
SCHMITT, C. O conceito do político. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2016.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge, 1994.
SKINNER, Quentin. The idea of negative liberty: philosophical and historical perspective. In: RORTY, Richard; SCHNEEWIND, Jerome B.; SKINNER, Quentin (Eds.). Philosophy in History. New York: Cambridge, 1984.
SLOBODIAN, Quinn; PLEHWE, Dieter. Market Civilizations: neoliberals east and south. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2022.
WEBER, Max. El político y el científico. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1979.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.
The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion
1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.