Paul Natorp e o Psychologismus-Streit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/Argumentos.31.17Keywords:
Natorp. Psicologismo. Método. Subjetividade.Abstract
O objetivo deste artigo é expor o cerne das críticas de Paul Natorp ao psicologismo. Expomos os argumentos que levam Natorp a concluir que o conhecimento não pode ter fundamento subjetivo, mas deve ter fundamento objetivo. Argumentamos que, segundo Natorp, o problema do psicologismo é fundamentalmente metodológico. O psicologismo confunde o estudo das leis do conhecimento com o estudo da legalidade da vida psíquica. Assim, o problema da gênese se confunde com o problema da validade.
References
ANDERSON, L. Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, v. 13, n. 2, p. 287-323, 2010.
BEISER, F. After Hegel: German philosophy, 1840-1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
BENEKE, F. E. Die Philosophie in ihrem Verhältnisse zur Erfahrung, zur Spekulation und zum Leben. Berlin; Posen; Bromberg: Mittler, 1833.
BENEKE, F. E. System der Logik als Kunstlehre des Denkens. Erster Teil. Berlin: F. Dümmler, 1842.
BENEKE, F. E. System der metaphysik und religionsphilosophie. Berlin: F. Dümmler, 1840.
BENEKE, F.; RAUE, G. The Elements of Psychology: On the Principles of Beneke, Stated and Illustrated in a Simple and Popular Manner. Oxford; London: James Parker and Co., 1871.
BURKE, B. Friedrich Eduard Beneke, the Man and His Philosophy: An Introductory Study. New York: Macmillan, 1895.
CASSIRER, E. The Problem of Knowledge. Philosophy, Science and History since Hegel. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
COURTINE, J. F. Reducción, construcción, desconstrucción. De un diálogo entre três: Natorp, Husserl, Heidegger. En: ROCHA DE LA TORRE, A. (Ed.). Heidegger Hoy. Bogotá: Gramma, 2011.
DUFOUR, É. Les Néokantiens. Valeur et vérité. Paris: Vrin, 2003.
EDGAR, S. Paul Natorp and the Emergence of Anti-Psychologism in the Nineteenth Century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, v. 39, n. 1, p. 54-65, mar./2008.
GONZÁLEZ PORTA, M. A. Züruck zu Kant! Dois pontos. Curitiba, São Carlos, v. 2, n. 2, p. 35-59, 2005.
HEIDEGGER, M. Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975.
HELMHOLTZ, H. v. Über das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaften zur Gesamtheit der Wissenschaft. Physikalische Blätter, v. 6, n. 4, p. 145-152, 1950.
HUSSERL, E. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster teil. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Text der 1. und der 2. Auflage. Halle: 1900, ed. rev. 1913. Elmar Holenstein. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975. [Hua XVIII].
JACQUETTE, D. Introduction: Psychologism the Philosophical Shibboleth. In: JACQUETTE, D. (Ed.). Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychologism Critical and Historical Readings on the Psychological Turn in Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
KÜLPE, O. Einleitung in die Philosophie. Leipzig: Hs. Messer, 1921.
KÜLPE, O. Immanuel Kant: Darstellung und Würdigung. Leipzig: Teubner, 1907.
KUSCH, M. Psychologism: The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London; New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
MESSER, A. Geschichte der Philosophie im 19. Jahrhundert bis zu Gegenwart. Leipzig: Quelle-Meyer, 1920.
NATORP, P. Die logischen Grundlagen der ecxakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig; Berlin: Teubner, 1910.
NATORP, P. Leibniz und der Materialismus (1881). Aus dem Nachlaß herausgegeben (Holzhey, H.). Studia Leibnitiana, Bd. 17, H. 1, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1985, p. 3-14.
NATORP, P. Quantität und Qualität in Begriff, Urteil und gegenständlicher Erkenntnis, Philosophische Monatshefte, Bd XXVII, Heidelberg, 1891.
NATORP, P. Sozialpädagogik. Theorie der Willenserziehung auf der Grundlage der Gemeinschaft. Stuttgart: Fr. Frommanns Verlag (E. Hauff), 1899.
NATORP, P. Über objective und subjective Begründung der Erkentnnis I. Philosophische Monatshefte, Bd XXIII, 1887.
NATORP, P. Zu den logischen Grundlagen der neueren Mathematik, Archiv für systematische Philosophie, Bd. 7, p. 177-209; 372-438, 1901.
O’CONNOR, J. K. Precedents in Aristotle and Brentano for Husserl’s Concern with ‘Metabasis.’ The Review of Metaphysics, v. 61, n. 4, p. 737-757, 2008.
SIEMSEN, H. Ernst Mach, Friedrich Eduard Beneke and Kant. In: WAIBEL, V. L. RUFFING, M.;
WAGNER, D. (Eds.). Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2019. p. 3503-3510.
WINDELBAND, W. Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie. Dritte Auflage. Tübingen; Leipzig: Mohr, 1903.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.
The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion
1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.
.jpg)
._._3.png)
1.jpg)
._._._.png)
