Evaluation of educational technology on pressure injury based on assistance quality indicators





Wounds and Injuries; Pressure Ulcer; Education, Distance; Intensive Care Units; Inservice Training; Nursing.


Objective: to evaluate the contribution of educational technology on pressure injury regarding assistance quality indicators. Methods: a quasi-experimental study, with the design before and after the educational intervention, related to an online course on pressure injury. Data collection was done in three phases: the gathering of pressure injury indicators; implementation of the educational intervention; and post-intervention evaluation of the patients. Results: 47 patients were evaluated in each phase. The risk assessment and the description of the skin in the admission presented higher figures after the educational intervention. Description of preventive measures was higher in the educational post-intervention group, which presented a high-level index in the pre-intervention group (80.9%). The number of patients with pressure injury decreased from 53.2% to 42.6% (p=0.500). Conclusion:  the impact of the communication and information technology was observed, especially on the decrease of occurrence of injuries.


Tobase L, Grareschi APDF, Frias MAE, Prado C, Peres HHC. Technological resources in nursing education. J Haelth Inform [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 May 28]; 5(3):77-81. Available from: http://www.jhi-sbis.saude.ws/ojs-jhi/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/view/218

VanGilder C, Lachenbruch C, Algrim-Boyle C, Meyer S. The international pressure ulcer prevalence™ survey: 2006-2015A 10-year pressure injury prevalence and demographic trend analysis by care setting. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017; 44(1):20-8. doi: http://10.1097/WON.0000000000000292

Palhares VC, Palhares Neto AA. Prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit. Rev Enferm UFPE on line [Internet]. 2014 [cited May 28, 2018]; 8(2):3647-53. Available from: http://10.5205/reuol.4597-37683-1-ED.0810supl201410

Stuque AG, Sasaki VDM, Teles AAS, Santana ME, Rabeh SAN, Sonobe HM. Protocol for prevention of pressure ulcer. Rev Rene. 2017; 18(2):272-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2017000200018

Tayyib N, Coyer F, Lewis P. Saudi Arabian adult intensive care unit pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors: a prospective cohort study. Int Wound J. 2016; 13(5):912-9. doi: https://doi-org.ez11.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/iwj.12406

Queiroz FM, Aroldi JBC, Oliveira GDS, Peres HHC, Santos VLCG. Venous ulcer and compression therapy for nurses: development of online course. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012; 25(3):435-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002012000300018

Gonen A, Sharon D, Lev-Ari L. Integrating information technology’s competencies into academic nursing education – an action study. Cogent Educ. 2016; 4(1):1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1193109

Hinrichsen SL. Qualidade e segurança do paciente. Rio de Janeiro: Medbook; 2013.

Mallah Z, Nassar N, Badr LK. The effectiveness of a pressure ulcer intervention program on the prevalence of hospital acquired pressure ulcers: controlled before and after study. Appl Nurs Res. 2015; 28(2):106-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.07.001

Braden B, Bergstrom N. A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehabil Nurs. 2012; 25(3):105-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01879.x

Costa JB, Peres HHC, Rogenski NMB, Baptista CMC. An educational proposal to teach a pressure ulcer management course online to students and nursing professionals. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009; 22(5):607-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002009000500002



How to Cite

Caldini, L. N., Araújo, T. M. de, Frota, N. M., Barros, L. M., Silva, L. A. da, & Caetano, J. Áfio. (2018). Evaluation of educational technology on pressure injury based on assistance quality indicators. Rev Rene, 19, e32695. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20181932695



Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>