Qualidade metodológica da validação de estudos sobre cenários simulados em enfermagem

Juliana da Silva Garcia Nascimento; Fabiana Cristina Pires; Kleiton Gonçalves do Nascimento; Daniela da Silva Garcia Regino; Tainá Vilhar Siqueira; Maria Celia Barcellos Dalri

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20212262459

Autores

Juliana da Silva Garcia Nascimento Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-2738
Fabiana Cristina Pires Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-1449
Kleiton Gonçalves do Nascimento Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-6837
Daniela da Silva Garcia Regino Universidade Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-7783
Tainá Vilhar Siqueira Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-5620
Maria Celia Barcellos Dalri Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-8642

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20212262459

Palavras-chave:

Enfermagem; Simulação; Educação em Enfermagem; Aprendizagem; Estudo de Validação.

Resumo

Objetivo: avaliar a qualidade do processo de validação realizado em estudos que desenvolveram cenários clínicos simulados para o ensino e aprendizagem em enfermagem. Métodos: os pesquisadores procederam à realização de duas etapas: uma revisão integrativa nas bases de dados Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Web of Science, SCOPUS e Educational Resources Information Center; e a avaliação da validação, adotando-se a ferramenta validada (Avaliação da Qualidade para Estudos de Validade). Resultados: identificaram-se 561 estudos, dos quais seis compuseram a amostra, primários, metodológicos, disponíveis eletronicamente e na íntegra. A maioria apresentou boa qualidade de validação ao cumprir quase todos os critérios exigidos pela ferramenta. Conclusão: a validação dos estudos sobre cenários clínicos foi capaz de sustentar evidências confiáveis para a adoção no ensino por meio da simulação em enfermagem.

Referências

Hanshaw SL, Dickerson SS. High fidelity simulation evaluation studies in nursing education: a review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020; 46:102818. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102818

Lubbers J, Rossman C. Satisfaction and self-confidence with nursing clinical simulation: Novice learners, medium-fidelity, and community settings. Nurse Educ Today. 2017; 48:140-4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.010

Bortolato-Major C, Mantovani MF, Felix JVC, Boostel R, Silva ATM, Caravaca-Morera JA. Debriefing eva- luation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019; 72(3):788-94. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103

International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: simulationSM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016; 12(suppl):S-S12. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005

Tyerman J, Luctkar-Flude M, Graham L, Coffey S, Olsen-Lynch E. A systematic review of health care presimulation preparation and briefing effectiveness. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019; 27:12-25. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.002

Leigh G, Steuben F. Setting learners up for success: Presimulation and prebriefing strategies. Teach Learn Nurs. 2018; 13:185-9. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.004

Nascimento JSG, Costa ABF, Sangiovani JC, Silva TCS, Regino DSG, Dalri MCB. Pre-simulation, pre-briefing or briefing in nursing simulation: what are the differences? Rev Eletr Enferm. 2020; 22:60171. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5216/ree.v22.60171

Oliveira SN, Massaroli A, Martini JG, Rodrigues J. From theory to practice, operating the clinical simulation in Nursing teaching. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(Suppl 4):1791-8. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0180

Adib-Hajbaghery M, Sharifi N. Effect of simulation training on the development of nurses and nursing students’ critical thinking: a systematic literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017; 50:17-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.011

Eyikara E, Baykara GZ. The importance of simulation in nursing education. World J Educ Technol [Internet]. 2017 [cited Jan 19, 2021];9(1):2-7. Avai- lable from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141174

Kaneko RMU, Lopes MHBM. Realistic health care simulation scenario: what is relevant for its design? Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019; 53:e03453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018015703453

Olaussen C, Heggdal K, Tvedt CR. Elements in scenario based simulation associated with nursing students’ self‐confidence and satisfaction: a cross sectional study. Nurs Open. 2020; 7(1):170-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.375

Mazzo A, Miranda FBG, Meska MHG, Bianchini A, Bernardes RM, Pereira Junior GA. Teaching of pressure injury prevention and treatment using simulation. Esc Anna Nery. 2018; 22(1):e20170182. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2017-0182

Fabri RP, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Fonseca AS, Pedersoli CE, Miranda FBG, et al. Development of a theoretical-practical script for clinical simulation. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017; 51:e03218. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016016403218

Andrade PON, Oliveira SC, Morais SCRV, Guedes TG, Melo GP, Linhares FMP. Validation of a clinical simulation setting in the management of post partum haemorrhage. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019; 72(3):624-31. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0065

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. 2020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2

Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 52(5):546-53. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Santos CM, Pimenta CA, Nobre MR. The pico strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2007; 15(3):508-11. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(1):210. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Ursi ES, Galvão CM. Perioperative prevention of skin injury: an integrative literature review. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2006; 14(1):124-31. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000100017

Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Pippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

Minayo MC. Sampling and saturation in qualitative research: consensuses and controversies. Rev Pesqui Qual [Internet]. 2017 [cited Jan 19, 2021];5(7):1-12. Available from: https://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/article/view/82/59

Gore S, Goldberg A, Huang, MH, Shoemaker M, Blackwood J. Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies (QAVALS). Physiother. Theory Practic. 2019; 1-9. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2019.1636435

Jung JL, Hyeon-Cheol J, Kyung-Ah K, Ye-Jean K, Myung-Nam L. Development of a simulation scenario and evaluation checklist for patients with asthma in emergency care. Comp Inform Nu. 2015; 33(12):546-54. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000193

Eduardo AHA, Mendes AA, Binotto CCS, Tognoli SH, Tucci AMGB. Scenario for a simulation of health services’ waste: a methodological study. Online Braz J Nurs [Internet]. 2016 [cited Jan 19, 2021]; 15(4):611-6. Available from: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/5672

Negri EC, Pereira GA Júnior, Cotta Filho CK, Franzon JC, Mazzo A. Construction and validation of simulated scenario for nursing care to colostomy patients. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2019; 28:e20180199. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2018-0199

Souza RS, Oliveira PP, Dias AAL, Simão DAS, Peli- zari AEB, Figueiredo RM. Prevention of infections associated with peripheral catheters: construction and validation of clinical scenario. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020; 73(5):e20190390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0390

Crestani AH, Moraes AB, Souza APR. Content validation: clarity/relevance, reliability and internal consistency of enunciative signs of language acquisition. CoDAS. 2017; 29(4):e20160180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/201720160180

Nora CRD, Zoboli E, Vieira MM. Validation by experts: importance in translation and adaptation of instruments. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017; 38(3):e64851. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.03.64851