On the distortion of praxis: in defense of Thomas Hobbes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/arf.v1i1.18921Keywords:
Hobbes. Aristotle. Praxis. Techné. State.Abstract
This article is destined to show that Hobbes cannot be seen as someone who subscribed the conception of homo faber proposed by Bacon. Hobbes certainly upheld the notion that nature is instrumental to human purposes. It will be proved, however, that it is incorrect to assume that he distorted the Aristotelian notions of ‘práxis and téchné’ and that such a distortion contributed to perpetuate the illusion that human beings can indiscriminately act over nature.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.
The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion
1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.
.jpg)
._._3.png)
1.jpg)
._._._.png)
