Moral theory and reflective equilibrium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/arf.v7i13.19099Keywords:
Considered moral judgments. Moral theory. Reflective equilibrium.Abstract
John Rawls claims, in A Theory of Justice, that the moral theorist’s role is to formulate principles of justice that characterize our competence to distingish between right and wrong. The aim of this article is to discuss the meaning of this claim. I analyze and argue against the reading recently advocated by Mikhail. According to Mikhail, Rawls is proposing a “naturalistic conception” of moral theory as a empirical inquiry. I maintain that this reading is based on a misreading of the idea of reflective equilibrium.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.
The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion
1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.
.jpg)
._._3.png)
1.jpg)
._._._.png)
