The evidence for relativism about future contingents

Authors

  • Matias Gariazzo

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.36517/arf.v8i15.19130

    Keywords:

    Future contingents. Indeterminism. Relativism. Supervaluationism.

    Abstract

    John MacFarlane (2003; 2008; 2014, p. 201-237) claims that his relativist view on future contingents satisfies two desiderata: it is compatible with indeterminism and allows us to assess as accurate an assertion about a contingent event that has already occurred but that had not occurred when the assertion was made. Supervaluationism satisfies the first desideratum but not the second. I argue that MacFarlane does not provide good reasons to prefer his view to supervaluationism, and so for accepting his second desideratum. The only possible evidence that could be used to support his proposal consists in the apparent existence of accurate future contingent claims made in the past, and this evidence can be easily put into question. As a result, relativism is ill motivated in the case of future contingents.

    Downloads

    Published

    2016-01-01

    Issue

    Vol. 8 No. 15

    Section

    Varia

    License

    Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.

    The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion

    1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

    2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.

    How to Cite

    Gariazzo, M. (2016). The evidence for relativism about future contingents. Argumentos - Revista De Filosofia, 8(15). https://doi.org/10.36517/arf.v8i15.19130