Care needs of the elderly who live alone: an intersectoral perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202144395Keywords:
Frail Elderly; Intersectoral Collaboration; Patient Care Team; Aged Rights; Aging.Abstract
Objective: to understand the perception of health and law professionals regarding care for frail elderly people who live alone. Methods: qualitative research, carried out through interviews with health and law professionals, using a vignette as a trigger, presenting the description of the story of a frail elderly woman who lived alone. Data were submitted to the thematic analysis technique. Results: the 23 professionals pointed out that the family members should be the responsible ones for the elderly; that institutionalization should take place as the last option; stressed the importance of multi-professional and intersectoral work; and recognized the limitations of the state. The professionals reported the appropriate interventions for the case. Conclusion: in care for the elderly who live alone, there are limitations for families, social care, and health services for the elderly, as well as the State, with the need to strengthen legally guaranteed resources.
References
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios: síntese de indicadores 2015 [Internet]. 2016 [cited May 3, 2020]. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv98887.pdf
Andrade JM, Duarte YAO, Alves LC, Andrade FCD, Souza-Junior PRB, Lima-Costa MF, et al. Frailty profile in Brazilian older adults: ELSI-Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2018; 52(Suppl 2):17s. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000616
Duarte YAO, Nunes DP, Andrade FB, Corona LP, Brito TRP, Santos JLF, et al. Frailty in older adults in the city of São Paulo: Prevalence and associated factors. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2018; 21(Suppl 2):e180021. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180021.supl.2
Bernardo MHJ. A produção de cuidados na família e as políticas para o envelhecimento. Pauta. 2018; 16(42):65-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.12957/rep.2018.39408
Camarano AA, Barbosa P. Instituições de longa permanência para idosos no Brasil: do que se está falando? In: Alcântara AO, Camarano AA, Giacomin KC. Política nacional do idoso: velhas e novas questões. Rio de Janeiro: Ipea; 2016. p.479-514.
Negrini ELD, Nascimento CF, Silva A, Antunes JLF. Elderly persons who live alone in Brazil and their lifestyle. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2018; 21(5):523-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562018021.180101
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Internet]. 2010 [cited May 9, 2020]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/v4/brasil/sp/marilia/panorama
Minayo MCS. Amostragem e saturação em pesquisa qualitativa: consensos e controvérsias. Rev Pesq Qual [Internet]. 2017 [cited May 9, 2020]; 5(7):1-12. Available from: https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/82
Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2014.
Silva RS, Fedosse E, Pascotini FS, Riehs EB. Condições de saúde de idosos institucionalizados: contribuições para ação interdisciplinar e promotora de saúde. Cad Bras Ter Ocup. 2019; 27(2):345-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoao1590
Klinenberg E. Social isolation, loneliness, and living alone: identifying the risks for public health. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106(5):786-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303166
Vale MS, Faleiros VP, Santos IB, Matos NM. Proposed methodology of work for the mediation of violence against elderly people conflicts: a non-legal proposition. Textos Contextos. 2015; 14(1):104-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1677-9509.2015.1.18168
Veras R. Care pathway for the elderly: detailing the model. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2016; 19(6):887-905.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562016019.160205
Damaceno DG, Lazarini CA, Chirelli MQ. Caring for institutionalized elderly: representations of managers and professionals. Esc Anna Nery. 2019; 23(3):e20190036. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2019-0036
Henning-Smith C, Shippee T, Capistrant B. Laterlife disability in environmental context: why living arrangements matter. Gerontologist. 2017; 58(5):853-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303166
Plassa BO, Alarcon MFS, Damaceno DG, Sponchiado VBY, Braccialli LAD, Silva JAVE, et al. Flowchart of elderly care victms of abuse: an interdisciplinary perspective. Esc Anna Nery. 2018; 22(4):e20180021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2018-0021
Burnes D, Sheppard C, Henderson Jr CR, Wassel M, Cope R, Barber C, et al. Interventions to Reduce Ageism Against Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Public Health. 2019; 109(8):e1-e9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305123
Mendes R, Fernandez JCA, Sacardo DP. Promoção da saúde e participação: abordagens e indagações. Saúde Debate. 2016; 40(108):190-203. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104-20161080016
Miranda GMD, Mendes ACG, Silva ALA. Population aging in Brazil: current and future social challenges and consequences. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2016; 19(3):507-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-98232016019.150140
Fjordside S, Morville A. Factors influencing older people’s experiences of participation in autonomous decisions concerning their daily care in their own homes: a review of the literature. Int J Older People Nurs. 2016; 11(4):284-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12116
