Adesão de conformidade ao Checklist de Segurança Cirúrgica na Cesárea

Lara Mabelle Milfont Boeckmann; Maria Cristina Soares  Rodrigues; Cesar Messias de  Oliveira

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20202143912

Autores

Lara Mabelle Milfont Boeckmann Universidade de Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-559X
Maria Cristina Soares Rodrigues Universidade de Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-7408
Cesar Messias de Oliveira University College London https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4099-4762

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202143912

Palavras-chave:

Segurança do Paciente; Cesárea; Lista de Verificação; Enfermagem Obstétrica.

Resumo

Objetivo: verificar a adesão de conformidade aos procedimentos de equipes de saúde em cesáreas. Métodos: estudo transversal, descritivo e analítico, realizado em Centro Obstétrico de hospital público, com 220 cesáreas. Empregaram-se o teste Tukey e a Análise de Variância, considerando significância de 5%. Resultados: a idade média das pacientes foi de 28,8 anos (±6,06). As principais indicações para cesárea foram: sofrimento fetal (12,8%), diabetes gestacional (9,5%), iteratividade (9,2%), cesárea prévia (8,2%) e pré-eclâmpsia grave (5,9%). Constataram-se ausência de condutas unificadas e incipiente comunicação entre os profissionais. As taxas de adesão de conformidade das equipes aos itens do Checklist das Dimensões A, B e C foram, respectivamente, 36,0%, 11,1% e 50,0%. Conclusão: evidenciou-se baixa adesão das equipes aos procedimentos de segurança cirúrgica em cesáreas.

Referências

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Diretrizes de atenção à gestante: a operação cesariana [Internet]. 2015 [cited May 2, 2020]. Available from: http://conitec.gov.br/images/Consultas/Relatorios/2015/Relatorio_PCDTCesariana_CP.pdf

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0148343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1349-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31930-5

Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(1):e1002494. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494

World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for safe surgery. Safe surgery saves lives [Internet]. 2009 [cited Mai 2, 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/tools_resources/9789241598552/en/

Boeckmann LMM, Rodrigues MCS. Adaptation and validation of a surgical safety checklist in the cesarean delivery. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2018; 27(3):e27800172016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180002780017

Novo JLVG, Pellicciari CR, Camargo LDR, Bálsamo SB, Novo NF. Indications of cesarean births in hospitals affiliate to the Unified Health System: low and high risks. Rev Fac Ciênc Méd. 2017; 19(2):67-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-4840.2017v19i2a48

Magnago TSBS, Lanes TC, Gonçalves NGC, Ongaro JD, Almeida FO, Dalmolin GL. Assessment of adherence to safe surgery checklist in a university hospital. Rev Enferm UFSM. 2019; 9(e63):1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769236780

Ribeiro HCTC, Quites HFO, Bredes AC, Sousa KAS, Alves M. Adherence to completion of the safe surgery checklist. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017; 33(1):e00046216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00046216

Almeida RE, Rodrigues MCS. Implementation of the surgical safety checklist for pediatric operations: compliance assessment. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2019; 40(esp):e20180270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180270

Birolini DV, Rasslan S, Utiyama EM. Unintentionally retained foreign bodies after surgical procedures. Analysis of 4547 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016; 43(1):12-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016001004

Tase TH, Tronchin DMR. Patient identification systems in obstetric units, and wristband conformity. Acta Paul Enferm. 2015; 28(4):374-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201500063

Gomes APTS, Querido DL, Silva GRG, Almeida LF, Rocha RG. The importance of newborn identification to the delivery of safe patient care. Cogitare Enferm. 2017; 22(3):e49501. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v22i3.49501

Amaya MR, Maziero ECS, Grittem L, Cruz EDA. Analysis of the registration and content of surgical safety checklists. Esc Anna Nery. 2015; 19(2):246-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20150032

Keijzer WW, Agha RA, Greig A. WHO Safer Surgery checklist compliance amongst paediatric emergency plastic surgery patients in an UK hospital. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017; 21:49-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.049

Thomas AN, MacDonald JJ. Patient safety incidents associated with failures in communication reported from critical care units in the North West of England between 2009 and 2014. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016; 17(2):129-35. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1751143715626938

Burgener AM. Enhancing communication to improve patient safety and to increase patient satisfaction. Health Care Manager. 2017; 36(3):238-43. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000165

Tostes MF, Haracemiw A, Mai LD. Surgical safety checklist: considerations on institutional policies. Esc Anna Nery. 2016; 20(1):203-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20160027

Boeckmann LM, Rodrigues MC. Surgical safety in cesarean section: integrative review. Cogitare Enferm. 2015; 20(4):758-66. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v20i4.4108

Whelehan DF, McCarrick CA, Ridgway PF. A systematic review of sleep deprivation and technical skill in surgery. Surgeon. 2020; 20:30015-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.01.004