A new working configuration: an interpretive analysis of the coworking literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.v16i2.1038Keywords:
Coworking, collaboration, innovation, work, entrepreneurship.Abstract
This study sought to understand the theoretical scope of the concept of coworking. A systematic review of the literature and an interpretative analysis of the content of the identified articles were carried out. The conclusions of the research include: (a) coworking is a recent, not sufficiently explored concept; (b) it has been explored at different levels of analysis: as a component of creative cities or cultures, as belonging to collaborative consumption, as one among several shared workspaces and as working model divergent from traditional ones; (c) there are divergences of expectations and demands on the meaning and on the form of using coworking spaces; (d) the expected benefits of the phenomenon are not observed in all coworking spaces; (e) the collaborative construction of meanings and the formation of a community sense are important elements to the emergence of coworking benefits.
References
ASSENZA, Pauline. If You Build It Will They Come? The Influence of Spatial Configuration on Social and Cognitive Functioning and Knowledge Spillover in Entrepreneurial Co-Working and Hacker Spaces. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, v. 16, n. 3, p. 35-48, 2015.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa, Portugal: Edições 70, LDA, 2009.
BILANDZIC, Mark; FOTH, Marcus. Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, v. 31, n. 2, p. 254-273, 2013.
CAPDEVILA, Ignasi. Typologies of Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation. 2013. Disponível em: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2414402> ou Acesso em: 14 ago. 2016.
CAPDEVILA, Ignasi. Different Inter-Organizational Collaboration Approaches in Coworking Spaces in Barcelona. 2014. Disponível em: < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2502816> ou <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502816>. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2016. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2414402.
CAPDEVILA, Ignasi. Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management (IJIM), v. 19, n. 03, p. 1 -28, 2015.
CARVALHAL, Felipe; MUZZIO, Henrique. Economia criativa e liderança criativa: uma associação (im)possível?. REAd: Rev. eletrôn. adm., Porto Alegre, v. 21, n. 3, p. 659-688, set/dez, 2015. Disponível em: < http://www.scielo.br/pdf/read/v21n3/1413-2311-read-21-03-00659.pdf> Acesso em: 14 ago. 2016. Doi: 10.1590/1413-2311.0032015.54929.
COWORKING BRASIL. Censo Coworking Brasil 2017. Disponível em: <https://coworkingbrasil.org/censo/2017/>. Acesso em 01 mai. 2018.
DESKMAG. 2018 Global Coworking Survey. Disponível em: <https://www.dropbox.com/s/rjbmdo4wp4aeccx/2018%20Complete%20Coworking%20Forecast.pdf?dl=0>. Acesso em 01 mai. 2018.
DOS SANTOS, Claudia Maria Neme. Coworking: contribuições de um modelo de consumo colaborativo e da arquitetura corporativa para o gerenciamento das cidades. Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades, v. 2, n. 12, p. 84-95, 2014.
DRISKO, James W., MASCHI, Tina. Content analysis. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
EISENHARDT, K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532-550, 1989.
FUZI, Anita. Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 462-469, 2015.
GANDINI, Alessandro. The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera, v. 15, n. 1, p. 193-205, 2015.
GERBER, J.; MIRANDA, R.; BORNIA, A.; FREIRES, F. Organização de referenciais teóricos sobre diagnóstico para a previsão de demanda. GESTÃO.Org: Rev. Eletrôn. de gestão org., v. 11, n. 1, p. 160-185, jan./abr., 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/11614/organizacao-de-referenciais-teoricos-sobre-diagnostico-para-a-previsao-de-demanda/i/pt-br>. Acesso em 08 ago. 2016.
GODOY, A. S. Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 35, n. 2, p. 57-63, mar./abr., 1995
JYLHÄ, Tuuli et al. Towards business potential of workplace services in Finland. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 21, p. 518-523, 2015.
KOJO, Inka et al. Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland–what and how? Facilities, v. 34, n. 5/6, p. 302-313, 2016.
KUBÁTOVÁ, Jaroslava. The Cause and Impact of the Development of Coworking in the Current Knowledge Economy. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ECKM, 15., Sep. 2014, London. Proceedings… Kidmore End: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2014. p. 571 – 577.
KUBÁTOVÁ, Jaroslava. Cultural Differences in Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Environment. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ECKM, 17., Sep. 2016, London. Proceedings… Kidmore End: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2016. p. 513-519
LEUNG, Zeno CS. Boundary spanning in interorganizational collaboration. Administration in Social Work, v. 37, n. 5, p. 447-457, 2013.
LIEBOWITZ, J.; BECKMAN, J. Knowledge organizations: what every manager should know. Nova York: St. Lucie, 1998.
MAURER, Angela Maria et al. Yes, we also can! O desenvolvimento de iniciativas de consumo colaborativo no Brasil. BASE: Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, v. 12, n. 1, p. 68-80, 2015.
MAZNEVSKI, M.; ATHANASSIOU, N. Bringing the Outside In: Learning and Knowledge Management Through External Networks. In: ICHIJO,K.; NONAKA, I. Knowledge creation and management: new challenges for managers. Nova York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2007.p. 69-82.
MILECK, Luiz Henrique Strapasson; PADOVANI, Stephania. Cocriação no mercado: um estudo exploratório de processos criativos de empreendedores. Strategic Design Research Journal, v. 8, n. 2, p. 74-82, 2015.
NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997.
PARRINO, Lucia. Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, v. 13, n. 3, p. 261-271, 2015.
POTTS, Jason; WATERS-LYNCH, Julian M. The Social Economy of Coworking Spaces: A Focal Point Model of Coordination. 2016. Disponível em: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2770874>. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2016. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2770874.
PRATT, Andy C. Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska annaler: series B, human geography, v. 90, n. 2, p. 107-117, 2008.
ROHDEN, Simoni Fernanda et al. Consumo Colaborativo: Economia, Modismo ou Revolução? Desenvolve Revista de Gestão do Unilasalle, v. 4, n. 2, p. 09-24, 2015.
SCHOPFEL, Joachim; ROCHE, Julien; HUBERT, Gilles. Co-working and innovation: new concepts for academic libraries and learning centres. New Library World, v. 116, n. 1/2, p. 67-78, 2015.
SOERJOATMODJO, Gita Widya Laksmini, et al. Sharing Workspace, Sharing Knowledge: Knowledge Sharing Amongst Entrepreneurs in Jakarta Co-Working Spaces. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, 12., 2015. Proceedings… Kidmore End: Academic Conferences International Limited, 2015, p. 259-267.
SPINUZZI, Clay. Working alone together coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, v. 26, n. 4, p. 399-441, 2012.
STRAUSS, A.; CORBIN, J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2. ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1998.
ŠVIRÁKOVÁ, Eva et al. Culture managers education: system dynamics model of the coworking design centre. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 174, p. 1684-1694, 2015.
UDA, Tadashi. What is Coworking? A Theoretical Study on the Concept of Coworking. 2013. Disponível em <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2937194> Acesso em: 14 ago. 2016. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2937194.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.