Adoption of new technologies: A study with non-users of the CPF issuance request system on the internet, with emphasis on sociodemographic aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.60978Keywords:
adoption of technology, use of technology, digital public services, sociodemographic aspects, UTAUTAbstract
This study analyzed factors determining the non-adoption of the CPF delivering service made available digitally, distinguishing non-adopting citizens due to demographic variables and technology usage habits. Theoretical basis was the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). The descriptive quantitative study obtained a sample of 383 postal customers. The instrument's internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's Alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlations between variables were analyzed, in addition to tests: Student's T, ANOVA and Chi-square. It was concluded that there is a complexity to meet user needs given the demographic characteristics existing in Brazil. The study recommends actions that lead to the development of more intuitive platforms, which may increase the diffusion of the digital platform.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Albertin, A. L., & Brauer, M. (2012). Resistência à educação a distância na educação corporativa. Revista de Administração Pública, 46(5), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122012000500009
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Brasil, MP. (2018). Painel dos serviços públicos. http://painelservicos.servicos.gov.br
Brasil, MP. (2019). Estratégia de Governança Digital – EGD. Transformação digital: cidadania e governo. Revised Version (2016-2019). https://www.gov.br/economia/pt-br/arquivos/planejamento/arquivos-e-imagens/arquivos/copy_of_RevisodaEstratgiadeGovernanaDigital20152019.pdf/view
Brasil. (2016). Decreto nº 8.638 de 15 de janeiro de 2016. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/decreto/d8638.html
Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Prime. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
Farias, J. S., & Vieira, L. (2014). Technology Adoption: A review of the Information Systems’ approaches, theories and models. International Conference of RESER, Helsinki, Finland, 24. https://www.reser.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/RESER_2014_Proceedings.pdf
Farias, J. S., Vitor, T. D. L., Lins, P. V., & Pedroza, L. E. A., Filho (2015). Inclusão digital na terceira idade: um estudo sobre a propensão de idosos à adoção de tecnologias da informação e comunicação (TICs). Revista Gestão & Tecnologia. 15(3), 164-188. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2015.v15i3.776
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FGV. (2019). 30ª Pesquisa Anual de Administração e Uso de Tecnologia da Informação nas Empresas. https://eaesp.fgv.br/ensinoeconhecimento/centros/cia/pesquisa
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Readings: Addison-Wesley.
Gomes, C. M. R., & Farias, J. S. (2017). A influência da expectativa de desempenho e de esforço percebidas por usuários no uso de um aplicativo de compras. Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 20(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2017v20n1a5
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson New International Edition.
Heiskanen, E., Hyvönen, K., Niva, M., Pantzar, M., Timonen, P., & Varjonen, J. (2007). User involvement in radical innovation: are consumers conservative? European Journal of Innovation Management. 10(4), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710828790
IBGE. (2019). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílio Contínua. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/multidominio/condicoes-de-vida-desigualdade-e-pobreza/17270-pnad-continua.html?=&t=o-que-e
ITU. (2019). Internet usage information. https://www.broadbandcommission.org/mwg-internal/de5fs23hu73ds/progress?id=qnkG20WPRfbyDQEbJ7zKsTuotsqH23Lvfa2jHN339xM
Kaufman, E. (2005). El foro transversal de responsables informáticos: crisis, burocracia, redes y gobierno electrónico en la Argentina. Santiago de Chile: FLACSO. http://www.esterkaufman.com.ar/sitios/kaufman/publicaciones/FLACSO_Argentina_artChile.pdf
Levy, P. (2004). Ciberdemocracia. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.
Mainardes, E. W., Souza, I. M., & Correia, R. D. (2020). Antecedents and consequents of consumers not adopting e-commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102138
Malhotra, N. K. (2001). Pesquisa de Marketing: uma orientação aplicada. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Marôco, J. (2011). Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics (5. ed.). Portugal: Report Number.
Martins, M., Farias, J. S., Albuquerque, P. H. M., & Pereira, D. S. (2018). Adoção de tecnologia para fins de leitura: Um estudo da aceitação de e-books. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 15(6), 568-588. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2018.15.6.4
Monteiro, L. F. S. (2018). Transformação digital do governo. http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/3539
Moraes, G. H. S. M. (2003). Adoção de governo eletrônico no brasil: A perspectiva do usuário do programa Nota Fiscal Paulista (Doctoral Thesis). EAESP-FGV. São Paulo, SP, Brasil. https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/11364/Gustavo%20tese_final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Nobre, A. C. S., Ramos, A. S. M., & Nascimento, T. C. (2011). Adoção de práticas de gestão de segurança da informação: um estudo com gestores públicos. REUNA, 16(4), 95-113. https://revistas.una.br/reuna/article/view/405/454
OECD. (2003). E-government studies – the e-government imperative. Paris: OECD Publishing.
ONU. (2002). Benchmarking e-government: a global perspective. New York: Division for Public Economics and Public Administration.
Ratchford, M., & Barnhart, M. (2012). Development and validation of the technology adoption propensity (TAP) index. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.001
Ratchford, M., Ratchford, B., & Barnhart, M. (2014). A cross-category analysis of dispositional drivers of technology adoption. Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management, Research Paper, 2474908. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2474908
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Corrêa, E. S. (2009). A Comunicação Digital nas organizações: tendências e transformações. Organicom, 6(10-11), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2009.139020
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
Souza, R., Ribeiro, W. R., & Silva, P. P. (2019) O uso do aplicativo de saúde pública móvel Meu DigiSUS. Revista Valore, 4 (Edição Especial), 390-406. https://revistavalore.emnuvens.com.br/valore/article/view/379/324
Tacco, F. M. S. (2011) O impacto da Influência Social sobre a intenção de uso de sites de compras coletivas: um estudo baseado no modelo UTAUT (Master’s Dissertation). Universidade Metodista de São Paulo, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brasil. http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/bitstream/tede/6/1/Fabiana%20Martins%20de%20Souza%20Tacco.pdf
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570. https://doi.org/10.2307/249633
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/249443
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Zaltman, G., & Duncan R. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.