Evolution of scientific production on the Efficient Market: Bibliometric study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2024.92462Keywords:
finance, efficient market, scientific production, bibliometric analysis, future studies agendaAbstract
Contextualization: The text highlights the importance of Market Efficiency in the dynamic and complex market environment, which has been widely studied and analyzed. The approach to this topic arouses interest in academia and has been the subject of several studies.
Objective: The study aims to map scientific production related to the concept of Efficient Market, analyzing the evolution of academic work and research on the topic over time.
Method: The research adopts a descriptive approach with a quantitative focus and bibliometric analysis to measure scientific productivity indices on a specific topic. 478 relevant articles were identified in the Web of Science and Scopus databases from 1977 to 2023. The EndNote and Bibliometrix R software were used for analysis, followed by the creation of statistical tables and graphs for presentation in the biblioshiny and VOSviewer software.
Results: Data analysis revealed a constant increase in publications in the field of finance related to the topic, with emphasis on specific journals. Journal affiliations were mainly concentrated in the regions of America, Europe and Asia, in areas such as statistics, economics, business and management. Important references and topics covered included market efficiency, behavioral finance and stock market efficiency. Eugene Fama was highlighted as the most influential author. As for future trends, areas such as market efficiency analysis, risk management and predictability in periods of global conflicts have been identified, requiring complex and innovative methods.
Conclusions: These results contribute to expanding knowledge and understanding about market efficiency, encouraging the search for innovative and complex approaches to further advance this field of study.
References
Abubakar, J., & Aysan, A. F. (2022). Research trends in the field of islamic social finance. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 23, 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14395-3_14
Ali, A., & Bashir, H. A. (2022). Bibliometric study on asset pricing. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(3),433-460. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/QRFM-07-2020-0114
Ali, S., Raza, S. A., & Khan, K. A. (2023). Asymmetric market efficiency of the Eurozone using the MF-DFA: A comparison between global financial crisis and COVID-19. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-04-2021-0116
Anache, M., & Laurencel, L. C. (2013). Finanças comportamentais: Uma avaliação crítica da moderna teoria de finanças. Revista CADE, 12(1).
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Ball, R. (2005). The theory of stock market efficiency: Accomplishments and limitations. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 8(1), 4-18.
Camargos, M. A., & Barbosa, F. V. (2003). Teoria e evidência da eficiência informacional do mercado de capitais brasileiro. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração, 10(1).
Chang, H.-W., Chiang, Y.-C., Kim-C., Wang, M.-H., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2023). Market efficiency of Asian stock markets during the financial crisis and non-financial crisis periods. International Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.08.020
Cho, P., & Kim, K. (2022). Global collective dynamics of financial market efficiency using attention entropy with hierarchical clustering. Fractal and Fractional, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6100562
Chun-Hao, C., & Jian-Min, Y. (2012). A bibliometric study of financial risk literature: A historic approach. Applied Economics, 44(22), 2827-2839. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.566208
Cruz, K. K., Prado, J. W., & Carvalho, F. M. (2023). O estado da arte em finanças comportamentais: Um estudo bibliométrico. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2133
Dosso, M., & Aysan, A. F. (2022). The technological impact in finance: A bibliometric study of fintech research. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 22, 193-209. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-030-94672-2_12
Edmans, A. (2009). Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01508.x
Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Fama, E. (1991). Efficient capital markets II. Journal of Finance, 46(1),1.575-1.617.
Fama, E. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics. 49(3), 283-306.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 2(47), 427-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
Filser, L. D., Silva, F. F., & Oliveira, O. J. (2017). State of research and future research tendencies in lean healthcare: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 112(2), 799-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1119 2-017-2409-8
Gaio, L. E., Stefanelli, N. O., & Pimenta, T. (2010). The impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on market efficiency: Evidence for the developed stock market. Finance Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103302
Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized methods of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054.
Hansen, L. P., & Jagannathan, R. (1991). Implications of security market data for models of dynamic economies. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 225-262.
Ipea (2014). Três visões inovadoras do mercado. https://www.ipea.gov.br/desafios/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2971:catid=28&Itemid=23
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Jensen, M. C. (1978). Some anomalies evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6.
Jiang, W. (2021). Applications of deep learning in stock market prediction: Recent progress. Expert Systems with Applications, 184(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115537
Kahneman, D.& Tversky, A. (1982). Psychology of Preferences. Investigation and Science Magazine, (66), 100-106.
Khan, A., Goodell, J. W., Hassan, M. K., & Paltrinieri, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520
Kotov, A. S., Tolkachev, I. S., Perepelitsa, D. G., Asyaeva, E. A., & Tursunov, B. A. (2022). Oscillator strategies application in stock movement prediction on the russian financial market: efficiency issues. International Relations in the Current World. https://doi.org/ 10.21902/Revrima.v4i37.6089
Kulikova, M. V., & Kulikov, G. Y. (2022). Estimation of market efficiency process within time-varying autoregressive models by extended Kalman filtering approach. A Review Journal, 128. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103619
Lee, S. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic, short-sale ban, and market efficiency: Empirical evidence from the European equity markets. Journal of Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-021-00254-w
Lo, A. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis: market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. J. Portf. Manage, 30, 15-29.
Lo, A. W. (2005). Reconciling efficient markets with behavioral finance: The adaptive markets hypothesis. Journal of Investment Consulting, 7, 21-44.
Maia, S. C., Benedicto, G. C., Prado, J. W., Robb, D. A., Bispo, O. N. A., & Brito, M. J. (2019). Mapping the literature on credit unions: A bibliometric investigation grounded in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics, 120, 929-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03165-1.
Malkie. B. G. (1989). Is the stock market efficient? Science - New Series, 243(4896), 1313-1318.
Mohanty, S. K., & Mishra, S. (2020). Regulatory reform and market efficiency: The case of Indian agricultural commodity futures markets. Research in International Business and Finance. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101145
Moy, R. L., & Lee, A. (1991). A bibliography of stock market anomalies. Journal of Financial. Education, 20, 41-51.
Nasir, A., Gherghina, Ș. C., Mata, M. N., Khan, K. I., Mata, P. N., & Ferrão, J. A. (2022). Testing stock market efficiency from spillover effect of Panama leaks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jrfm15020079
Navia-Rodríguez, J.-R., Cobos-Lozada, C.-A., & Mendoza-Becerra, M.-E. (2020). Algorithmic trading for financial time series prediction: A systematic review. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 337-357.
Oyewola, D. O., & Dada, E. G. (2022). Exploring machine learning: a scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer. Applied Sciences, 4(5), 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05027-7.
Patra, S., & Hiremath, G.S. (2022). An entropy approach to measure the dynamic stock market efficiency. Journal of Quantitative Economics. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40953-022-00295-x
Phiri, A. (2022). Can wavelets produce a clearer picture of weak-form market efficiency in Bitcoin? Eurasian Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-022-00214-8
Pinto, G., Rastogi, S., Kadam, S., & Sharma, A. (2020). Bibliometric study on dividend policy. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. 12(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-11-2018-0118
Prado, J. W., Castro, A. V., Carvalho, F. M., Vieira, K. C., Machado, L. K., & Tonelli, D. F. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: A bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968–2014). Scientometrics, 106(3), 1007-1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1119 2-015-1829-6
Santamaría, T, C., Martin-Bujack, K., Portela, J., & Sáenz-Diez, R. (2022). Early market efficiency testing among hydrogen players. International Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.iref.2022.08.011
Schwert, G. W. (1983). Size and stock returns and other empirical regularities. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(1), 3-12.
Schwert, G. W. (2003). Anomalies and market efficiency. Handbook of the Economics of Finance. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01024-0
Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends?”. American Economic Review, 71(3),421-436.
Shiller, R. J. (1987). Investor behavior in the october 1987 stock market crash: Survey evidence. NBER Working Paper No. w2446, SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=227115
Shternshis, A., Mazzarisi, P., & Marmi, S. (2022). Measuring market efficiency: The Shannon entropy of high-frequency financial time series. Chaos, Solitons and Fractal. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112403
Silva, P. V. J. G., Santos, J. B., & Pereira, G. P. (2019). Behavioral finance in Brazil: A bibliometric study from 2007 to 2017. Latin American Business Review, 20(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10978526.2019.1578177
Souza, O. T., & Carvalho J. V. F. (2023). Market efficiency assessment for multiple exchanges of cryptocurrencies, Revista de Gestão. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-05-2022-0070
Suárez, K. J. S., Duarte, J. B. D., & Ortíz, V. A. R. (2015). Predictability of returns in the Colombian stock market and the adaptive market hypothesis. Management Studies, 31, 411-418.
Takaishi, T. (2022). Time evolution of market efficiency and multifractality of the japanese stock market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jrfm15010031
Titan, A. G. (2015). The efficient market hypothesis: Review of specialized literature and empirical research. Procedia Economics and Finance. 32, 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01416-1
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring Scholarly Impact, 285-320.
Vogl, M. (2023). Hurst exponent dynamics of S&P 500 returns: Implications for market efficiency, long memory, multifractality and financiais crises predictability by application of a nonlinear dynamics analysis framework. Chaos, Solitons and Fractal. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112884
Yaya, O. S., Adekoya, O. B., Vo, X. V., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2022). Stock market efficiency in Asia: Evidence from the Narayan–Liu–Westerlund's GARCH-based unit root test. International Journal of Finance and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2676
Ying, Q. W., Yousaf, T., Ain, Q., Akhtar, Y., & Rasheed, M. S. (2019). Stock investment and excess returns: A critical review in the light of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020097
Zhu, R., Long, L., & Gong, Y. (2022). Emission trading system, carbon market efficiency, and corporate innovations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159683
Zupic, I., & Ater, T. (2014). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal: only for the 1st publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.
3.png)
1.jpg)
1.jpg){kind=small}
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
2.png)
1.jpg)
2.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
