Relación de la utilidad presupuestaria en el empoderamiento y la creatividad

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2020.43566

Palabras clave:

creatividad, utilidades de presupuesto, empoderamiento, control de gestión, tecnologías de la información

Resumen

El estudio tiene como objetivo analizar la relación entre el nivel de utilidad percibida del presupuesto en el empoderamiento y la creatividad. Se desarrolló una investigación exploratoria cuantitativa, con datos primarios de un cuestionario aplicado a 100 gerentes en organizaciones brasileñas de tecnología de la información. El tratamiento de los datos se llevó a cabo mediante modelado de ecuaciones estructurales. La utilidad percibida del presupuesto proporciona a los empleados la creencia de que tienen la libertad de tomar decisiones, dentro de un cierto límite de espacio definido, que proporciona la estructura de apoyo y autonomía necesaria para el empoderamiento y, a su vez, la creatividad.

Biografía del autor/a

THIAGO BRUNO DE, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD)

Doutorando em Contabilidade pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Mestre em Ciências Contábeis (2016) pela Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB), Especialista em Controladoria (2013) e Bacharel em Ciências Contábeis (2012) pela Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB). Professor efetivo da Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD) do Curso de Ciências Contábeis.

Carlos Eduardo Facin Lavarda, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Doutor em Contabilidade pela Universidade de Valência (Espanha, 2008) homologado pela USP (2009), Graduado em Ciências Contábeis pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (1992), graduado em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (1990), Mestre em Ciências Contábeis pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (2004).

Citas

Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995

Arnold, M. C., & Gillenkirch, R. M. (2015). Using negotiated budgets for planning and performance evaluation: an experimental study. Accounting, organizations and society, 43, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.06.001

Arnold, M., & Artz, M. (2019). The use of a single budget or separate budgets for planning and performance evaluation. Accounting, organizations and society, 73, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.06.001

Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.003

Chen, C. X. (2017). Management control for stimulating different types of creativity: The role of budgets. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51795

Cools, M., Stouthuysen, K., & Van den Abbeele, A. (2017). Management control for stimulating different types of creativity: The role of budgets. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51789

Curtis, E., & Sweeney, B. (2017). Managing different types of innovation: mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 313-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1255585

Dal Magro, C. B., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2015). Evidências sobre a caracterização e utilidade do orçamento empresarial nas indústrias de Santa Catarina. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 8(1), 039-062. https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2015080103

Davila, A., & Ditillo, A. (2017). Management Control Systems for Creative Teams: Managing Stylistic Creativity in Fashion Companies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51806

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024

Ekholm, B. G., & Wallin, J. (2011). The impact of uncertainty and strategy on the perceived usefulness of fixed and flexible budgets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(1‐2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02228.x

Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040653

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.

Grabner, I., & Speckbacher, G. (2016). The cost of creativity: A control perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 48, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.11.001

Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.

Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hartline, M. D., & Ferrell, O. C. (1996). The management of customer-contact service employees: an empirical investigation. The Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251901

Henri, J. F., & Wouters, M. (2019). Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101073

Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C. H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624-641. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61968124

Janka, M., & Guenther, T. W. (2018). Management control of new product development and perceived environmental uncertainty: Exploring heterogeneity using a finite mixture approach. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 131-161. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52019

Lambe, C. J., Webb, K. L., & Ishida, C. (2009). Self-managing selling teams and team performance: The complementary roles of empowerment and control. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.10.003

Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.

Mucci, D., Frezatti, F., & Dieng, M. (2016). As múltiplas funções do orçamento empresarial. RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 20(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2016140121

Müller-Stewens, B., Widener, S. K., Möller, K., & Steinmann, J. C. (2020). The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 80, 101078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101078

Muzzio, H., & Paiva Júnior, F. G. de. (2015). A pertinência de adequação da gestão criativa à identidade do indivíduo criativo. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 13(3), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.v13i3.711

Ringle, C. M., Silva, D., & Bido, D. D. S. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais com utilização do SmartPLS. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self‐regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X304398

Simons, R. (1995a). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business Press.

Simons, R. (1995b). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review (March/April): 80-88.

Sivabalan, P., Booth, P., Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2009). An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget. Accounting & Finance, 49(4), 849-871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00305.x

Speckbacher, G. (2017). Creativity Research in Management Accounting: A Commentary. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51754

Speklé, R. F., van Elten, H. J., & Widener, S. K. (2017). Creativity and Control: A Paradox—Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(2), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51759

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865

Wåhlin, N., Blomquist, T., Knardal, P. S., & Pettersen, I. J. (2015). Creativity and management control–the diversity of festival budgets. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(4), 679-695. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-11-2014-0082

Publicado

2020-06-15

Cómo citar

THIAGO BRUNO DE, & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2020). Relación de la utilidad presupuestaria en el empoderamiento y la creatividad. Contextus – Revista Contemporánea De Economía Y Gestión, 18, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2020.43566

Número

Sección

Artículos