Instrument for nursing consultation to pregnant women with diabetes mellitus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192040104Keywords:
Nursing; Validation Studies; Women’s Health; Diabetes Mellitus; Nursing Processes.Abstract
Objective: to construct and validate an instrument to assist the nursing consultation of pregnant women with diabetes mellitus. Methods: methodological study involving the construction of an instrument and evaluation by expert judges in the area who delivered opinions on the objectives, structure, presentation, relevance and content of the instrument of each item. Results: the instrument obtained a satisfactory evaluation in the evaluated criteria, obtaining an index of validity of general content above 85.0% and index of content validity above 80.0% in most of the items. Five items were modified according to the recommendations provided by the judges. Conclusion: the content of the instrument was considered valid to guide the nursing consultation, favoring the promotion of quality of life, adoption of healthy life habits and self-care practices, and provides glimpses of emotional, psychological and social aspects that may influence the endocrine modifications during gestation.
References
American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2018. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(Supl. 1):13-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S002
Orozco LB, Alves SHS. Diferenças do autocuidado entre pacientes com diabetes mellitus tipo 1 e 2. Psic Saúde Doenç. 2017; 18(1):234-47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15309/17psd180119
Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes. Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes, 2017-2018 [Internet]. 2017 [citado 2019 jan. 20]. Disponível em: https://www.diabetes.org.br/profissionais/images/2017/diretrizes/diretrizes-sbd-2017-2018.pdf
Costa RC, Campos MOC, Marques LARV, Rodrigues Neto EM, Franco MC, Diógenes ESG. Diabetes gestational assisted: profile and knowledge of pregnant women. Rev Saúde. 2015; 41(1):131-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2236583413504
Hildén K, Hanson U, Persson M, Magnuson A, Simmons D, Fadl H. Gestational diabetes and adiposity are independent risk factors for perinatal outcomes: a population based cohort study in Sweden. Diabet Med. 2019; 36(2):151-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13843
Silva AL, Amaral AR, Oliveira DS, Martins L, Silva MR, Silva JC. Neonatal outcomes according to diferente therapies for gestational diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 2017; 93(1):87-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2016.04.004
Borges MCV, Souza Júnior JA, Ribeiro LAN, Ribeiro MF, Oliveira PC, Reis RMS, et al. O conhecimento das gestantes sobre o diabetes mellitus gestacional em unidade de pré-natal no sul de Minas Gerais. Arch Health Invest. 2017; 6(8):348-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21270/archi.v6i8.2089
Lucena AF, Magroa CZ, Proençab MCC, Piresa AUB, Moraes VM, Alitia GB. Validation of the nursing interventions and activities for patients on hemodialytic therapy. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017; 38(3):e66789. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.03.66789
Rabasová P. Content validation of nursing diagnosis of deficient fluid volume [dehydration] in the context of neonatological nursing. Cent Eur J Nurs Midwifery. 2017; 8(2):622-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2017.08.0011
Domingos CS, Moura PC, Braga LM, Rodrigues NV, Correia MDL, Carvalho AMP. Construction and validation of the historical contents of nursing guided by Orem reference. Rev Min Enferm. 2015; 19(2):176-18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20150033
Lopes MVO, Silva VM, Herdman TH. Causation and validation of nursing diagnoses: a middle range theory. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017; 28(1):53-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12104
Medeiros RKS, Ferreira Júnior MA, Pinto DPSR, Vitor AF, Santos VEP, Barichello E. Modelo de validação de conteúdo de Pasquali nas pesquisas em Enfermagem. Rev Enf Ref. 2015; 4(4):127-35. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12707/RIV14009
Machado RC, Gironés P, Souza AR, Moreira RSL, Von Jakitsch CB, Branco JNR. Nursing care protocol for patients with a ventricular assist device. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017; 70(2):335-41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0363
Vohra RS, Cowley JB, Bhasin N, Barakat HM, Gough MJ. Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: a global survey of frontline medical professionals. Ann Med Surg. 2015; 4(2):119-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.04.001
Melo GAA, Silva RA, Pereira FGF, Caetano JA. Cultural adaptation and reliability of the General Comfort Questionnaire for chronic renal patients in Brazil. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2017; 25:e2963. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2280.2963
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Protocolos da Atenção Básica: saúde das mulheres [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2019 jan. 01]. Disponível em: http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/portaldab/publicacoes/protocolo_saude_mulher.pdf
Bueno AA, Beserra JAS, Weber ML. Características da alimentação no período gestacional. Life Style J. 2016; 3(2):29-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.19141/2237-3756/lifestyle.v3.n2.p30-43
Junges CF, Ressel LB, Monticelli M. Amongst wishes and possibilities: eating habits of pregnant women from an urban community in Southern Brazil. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2014; 23(2):382-90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072014000210013
Silva AMR, Almeida MF, Matsuo T, Soares DA. Risk factors for preterm births in Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2015; 25(10):2125-38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001000004
Mançu TS, Almeida OSC. Knowledge and feelings of diabetic pregnant women about gestational diabetes mellitus and treatment. Rev Enferm UFPE on line [Internet]. 2016 [cited Jan 13, 2019]; 10(3):1474-82. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/11089/12538
